Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 09:33:04 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd/extcon/regulators: max77843: add
 dtschema/bindings
Message-ID: <YgDnUNCNCO+JLyHU@google.com>
References: <20220111174805.223732-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
 <1bebedb9-644f-783d-492c-84a5de91720d@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1bebedb9-644f-783d-492c-84a5de91720d@canonical.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 11/01/2022 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The max77843 shares some parts with max77693 but it lacked bindings.  All
> > its compatibles were undocumented.  Add basic bindings for max77843,
> > matching existing devicetree.  These are not complete bindings, but
> > rather reverse-engineered to match current state.
> > 
> > I do not have access to device with MAX77843, so if anyone else
> > volunteers to be the bindings maintainer, please join.
> > 
> > Changes since v1
> > ================
> > 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas.
> > 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
> >    additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
> >    current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
> > 3. extcon: Use absolute path to schemas.
> > 
> > Dependencies
> > ============
> > 1. Patch 1/5 (dts): nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
> >    checker won't complain about DTS.
> >    I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
> > 
> > 2. The patch 4/5 (mfd bindings) depends on regulator and extcon, so they
> >    should come together (2+3+4+5).
> > 
> Dear Lee,
> 
> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
> you pick up patches 2-5 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?

Are the subsystem maintainers not going to review/ack?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog