Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 04:03:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 04:03:18 -0500 Received: from nydalah028.sn.umu.se ([130.239.118.227]:9857 "EHLO x-files.giron.wox.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 04:03:12 -0500 Message-ID: <00de01c174c6$d4d092b0$0201a8c0@HOMER> From: "Martin Eriksson" To: "Andre Hedrick" Cc: "Marcelo Tosatti" , "lkml" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: IDE is still crap.. or something Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 10:03:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Hedrick" To: "Martin Eriksson" Cc: "Marcelo Tosatti" ; "lkml" Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 8:06 AM Subject: Re: IDE is still crap.. or something > On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Martin Eriksson wrote: > > > > > any of the -c -u -m -W settings in hdparm. I even applied the 2.4.14 IDE > > > > patch (after fixing the rejects) but no go. > > Mr. Martin Eriksson, > > As for your subject -- "IDE" died a long time ago, but since it died > before you entered university, I am not at all surprized. Now as for > jumping on the case of the talented Mr. Marcelo Tosatti. He has not found > it neccessary to enter university at this time, as he could likely teach > the content scheduled in the next year to you. > > Why are you doing thoughtless things like overriding the ruleset for > optimizing the HOST/Device pair? I seriously doubt that you know the > history of those option? Of the lot, one of them is retired as of ATA-2; > however it still is optional for a while. The other is foolish in most > cases unless dealing with ATA-2 hardware, or have audio driver problems. > The next is settable by the kernel if you allow it to do the work for you. > The last is also set by the kernel, should you allow it to operate. There > is no valid reason for you to do anything w/ hdparm. Well, actually I'm not the "must-use-hdparm -c1 -u1 -d1 -m16 -W1 -X66" kind of guy... I just tested some options because my system was slow. I do not run hdparm now, and everything works fine (with your ATA patch, and the preempt patch). I'm moving the hard disks to the "on-board" controller (PIIX) today, to see if that works better (without preempt+ata). Also, I *would* be upgrading my linux system *if I had money*, but until then, I happily run with my crappy BP6, crappy HD's and crappy HPT366 controller. > Now this is a global reply to your list of rants. Now if you can not > merge patches and understand what is going on, then please keep the noise > down. Next time please have some credablity when you attempt to make > grand pontifications of code quality in Linux. Lastly you were not to be > a target for everyones entertainment but this is where you have come. I'm sorry if the subject set you off.. what I should have written is propably "ATA hard disk access slows down my system", but I was tired and had previously been reading "comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.space-sim". Also, I'm not meaning to sound important or anything with my sig. Maybe I should change it? Hmm... > > Regards, > > Andre Hedrick > Linux ATA Development > Linux Disk Certification Project _____________________________________________________ | Martin Eriksson | Linux developer / Ignorant excuse for a human / | Ranting bastard / Swede - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/