Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 18:01:48 +0000
From:   Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>,
        "cl@linux.com" <cl@linux.com>,
        "pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
        "mbenes@suse.cz" <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "jeyu@kernel.org" <jeyu@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
        "live-patching@vger.kernel.org" <live-patching@vger.kernel.org>,
        "ghalat@redhat.com" <ghalat@redhat.com>,
        "allen.lkml@gmail.com" <allen.lkml@gmail.com>,
        "void@manifault.com" <void@manifault.com>,
        "joe@perches.com" <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
Message-ID: <20220207180148.bbstggd4yr5ozfrf@ava.usersys.com>
References: <20220130213214.1042497-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
 <Yfsf2SGELhQ71Ovo@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <1ae3a950-8c1e-a212-e557-8f112a16457d@csgroup.eu>
 <20220207164659.ap42at2nphxu4q6o@ava.usersys.com>
 <b0a54f00-b9ac-df55-e8d2-d3eb95039a95@csgroup.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b0a54f00-b9ac-df55-e8d2-d3eb95039a95@csgroup.eu>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 2022-02-07 17:17 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Yes and that's the purpose of the patch I proposed at 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/patch/203348805c9ac9851d8939d15cb9802ef047b5e2.1643919758.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/

I see.

> Allthough I need to find out what's the problem reported by the robot.

I'll have a look too.

> As suggested by Luis, this fix should go once all ongoing work is done. 
> But it would be nice if you could just remove patch 5 from you series, 
> otherwise we would have to revert it later.

Perhaps it might be easier if I keep the patch within the series; once
merged into module-next, by Luis, you can rebase and then add the "Fixes:"
tag to resolve the issue, no?


Kind regards,

-- 
Aaron Tomlin