Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932563AbXBKXTU (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:19:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932567AbXBKXTU (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:19:20 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:39375 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932563AbXBKXTS (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:19:18 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:16:17 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Alan , Pavel Machek , Arjan van de Ven , LKML References: <1171058269.1484.64.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <20070211210258.0b8da53c@localhost.localdomain> <1171235428.4493.105.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> In-Reply-To: <1171235428.4493.105.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702120016.18480.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1662 Lines: 38 On Monday, 12 February 2007 00:10, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 21:02 +0000, Alan wrote: > > > > "If the device requires that, implement .suspend and .resume or at least > > > > define .suspend that will always return -ENOSYS (then people will know they > > > > have to unload the driver before the suspend). Similarly, if you aren't sure > > > > whether or not the device requires .suspend and .resume, define .suspend that > > > > will always return -ENOSYS." > > > > > > Sounds ok to me. Where should this text go? > > > Documentation/SubmittingDrivers ? > > > > And testing/submitting drivers, perhaps with additional text in that to > > make it clear we want suspend/resume support or good excuses > > > > "Please verify your driver correctly handles suspend and resume. If it > > does not your patch submission is likely to be suspended and only resume > > when the driver correctly handles this feature" > > Maybe make it explicit that testing should be done for both suspend to > ram and to disk, and with the following usage scenarios as applicable? > > - built in; > - modular, loaded while suspending but not loaded prior to resume from > disk; > - modular, loaded while suspending and loaded prior to resume from disk; I think we should state the general rule in Documentation/SubmittingDrivers and give more details in Documentation/power/devices.txt Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/