Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:04:10 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
       Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] make queue_delayed_work() friendly to flush_fork()
Message-ID: <20070212000410.GA91@tv-sign.ru>
References: <20070210215040.GA2213@tv-sign.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070210215040.GA2213@tv-sign.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 738
Lines: 25

On 02/11, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> This makes impossible to use flush_fork(delayed_work->work) in addition
> to cancel_delayed_work/cancel_rearming_delayed_work, not good.

It turns out this patch is in fact bug-fix.

I didn't notice that we already have flush_fork(delayed_work) calls!

This means that
	workqueue-make-cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue-work-on-idle-dwork.patch
	and this patch

should go just after
	implement-flush_work.patch

Sorry for inconvenience, please apply.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/