Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933048AbXBLGy7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:54:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933051AbXBLGy7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:54:59 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:10962 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933048AbXBLGy6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:54:58 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,312,1167638400"; d="scan'208"; a="195650697:sNHT20347887" Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:55:04 -0800 From: Valerie Henson To: Dave Jones , Michael Kerrisk , val_henson@linux.interl.com, lkml Subject: Re: Documenting MS_RELATIME Message-ID: <20070212065503.GC20919@nifty> References: <45CE0737.6010103@gmx.net> <20070211005400.GC6849@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070211005400.GC6849@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 589 Lines: 15 On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 07:54:00PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why > not to make this a default mount option ? Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as the default for some time now, with no obvious problems (I'm running Ubuntu). I see relatime as an improvement on noatime. -VAL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/