Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220128165956.27821-1-linmq006@gmail.com>
References: <20220128165956.27821-1-linmq006@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra210-quad: Fix missin IRQ check in tegra_qspi_probe
Message-Id: <164434681736.1135514.10319336540193161625.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 08 Feb 2022 19:00:17 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:59:56 +0000, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> This func misses checking for platform_get_irq()'s call and may passes the
> negative error codes to request_threaded_irq(), which takes unsigned IRQ #,
> causing it to fail with -EINVAL, overriding an original error code.
> Stop calling request_threaded_irq() with invalid IRQ #s.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: tegra210-quad: Fix missin IRQ check in tegra_qspi_probe
      commit: 47c3e06ed95aa9b74932dbc6b23b544f644faf84

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark