Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211006224659.21434-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20211006224659.21434-4-digetx@gmail.com>
 <YWimShkkxkR+bQLK@robh.at.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <YWimShkkxkR+bQLK@robh.at.kernel.org>
From:   Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 18:06:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CAODwPW-2othAhTC9a_joBdHScA86iqs-FkZJZDrK5LxrJm8F8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] dt-bindings: memory: lpddr2: Add revision-id properties
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Apologies for only noticing this a couple of months too late... but
this patch added the same thing to the "jedec,lpddr2" bindings that
were previously added by
https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg413733.html to
"jedec,lpddr3", but in a slightly incompatible manner. Should we
adjust it to make them consistent (two bytes in one property, rather
than a separate property for each)? Or is it too late to change that?