Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220207103802.280120990@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220207103802.280120990@linuxfoundation.org>
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:59:34 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtLmasiEHvfTw+PSabJCfJR2d8yiVyhn1nd4TcKfZ7bOw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/110] 5.15.22-rc1 review
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        slade@sladewatkins.com, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 at 16:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.22 release.
> There are 110 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:37:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.22-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Linux stable-rc 5.15 and 5.16 arm64 builds failed due to below errors.

  kvm/arm64: rework guest entry logic
  [ Upstream commit 8cfe148a7136bc60452a5c6b7ac2d9d15c36909b ]

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c: In function 'kvm_arm_vcpu_enter_exit':
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:769:9: error: implicit declaration of function
'guest_state_enter_irqoff'; did you mean 'guest_enter_irqoff'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  769 |         guest_state_enter_irqoff();
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |         guest_enter_irqoff
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:771:9: error: implicit declaration of function
'guest_state_exit_irqoff'; did you mean 'guest_exit_irqoff'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  771 |         guest_state_exit_irqoff();
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |         guest_exit_irqoff
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c: In function 'kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run':
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:866:17: error: implicit declaration of function
'guest_timing_enter_irqoff'; did you mean 'guest_enter_irqoff'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  866 |                 guest_timing_enter_irqoff();
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                 guest_enter_irqoff
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:916:17: error: implicit declaration of function
'guest_timing_exit_irqoff'; did you mean 'guest_exit_irqoff'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  916 |                 guest_timing_exit_irqoff();
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                 guest_exit_irqoff
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


build link:
-----------
https://builds.tuxbuild.com/24mNSY65SpZIASD4qYSPgMWIVqH/

steps to reproduce:
tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-11
--kconfig https://builds.tuxbuild.com/24mNSY65SpZIASD4qYSPgMWIVqH/config

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org