Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:31:55 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To:     Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@xilinx.com>
Cc:     "wg@grandegger.com" <wg@grandegger.com>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>,
        "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@xilinx.com>,
        Srinivas Goud <sgoud@xilinx.com>, git <git@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function
Message-ID: <20220209083155.xma5m7tayy2atyoo@pengutronix.de>
References: <20220208162053.39896-1-srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com>
 <20220209074930.azbn26glrxukg4sr@pengutronix.de>
 <DM6PR02MB53861A46A48B4689F668BEE9AF2E9@DM6PR02MB5386.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ghoqq6pqwpgc7xyw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB53861A46A48B4689F668BEE9AF2E9@DM6PR02MB5386.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Precedence: bulk


--ghoqq6pqwpgc7xyw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 09.02.2022 08:29:55, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> > On 08.02.2022 21:50:53, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> > > Add check for NAPI poll function to avoid enabling interrupts with out
> > > completing the NAPI call.
> >=20
> > Thanks for the patch. Does this fix a bug? If so, please add a Fixes:
> > tag that lists the patch that introduced that bug.
>=20
> It is not a bug. I am adding additional safety check( Validating the
> return value of "napi_complete_done" call).

Thanks for your feedback. Should this go into can or can-next?

regards,
Marc

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

--ghoqq6pqwpgc7xyw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEBsvAIBsPu6mG7thcrX5LkNig010FAmIDe/gACgkQrX5LkNig
011/twf9GGBR2QEXqjnEmw/xzHM60lmxr6bpT4M7YV7fCn4qqpSmKiNJvO8CbePC
Zyv7vyArUWuFtHsCOn4tEQeUr++ssJ82IPKWYBoO/AnNuU/XBid0J7n5cQP/B/ke
AQiGc9kPruEo5hI/yHXQEcWuehl40v9Xu7rEf7Mik/LaWc34ELzbTavxKEgVzyeY
BYKWU0J/yzgBPRzMAU49gS1Eb9+QYfT2KxjlVEcplbnhrAg6qHxGPGDKZNpxO6q+
JQIZXzTUnDAjkDGC0D7/rP4Z0l5yxhs2wedwMyEEZ9HPIUnJRbMIT0xe9WFdAxpw
3UUl4Jk056IshF5rZ6mRfqSSTm+jxg==
=1RHL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ghoqq6pqwpgc7xyw--