Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964822AbXBLJaj (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:30:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964821AbXBLJaj (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:30:39 -0500 Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.160]:50119 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964822AbXBLJai convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:30:38 -0500 From: Stefan Rompf To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Open reiserfs transactions (was Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: arvidjaar@mail.ru MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:34:08 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200702121034.08647.stefan@loplof.de> X-RZG-AUTH: kR2YrGeU3i5IZ7e/KoXXySNh16uouyfpvuAE9NRyohxnu02OuGTTkbe6PwRfQq/rApUg Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1338 Lines: 26 Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel > when I switch on the system after suspend to disk. Actually, after kernel > has been loaded, the whole resuming (up to the point I have usable desktop > again) takes about three time less than the process of loading kernel + > initrd. During loading disk LED is constantly lit. This almost looks like > kernel leaves HDD in some strange state, although I always assumed HDD/IDE > is completely reinitialized in this case. I have the same problem since I made my desktop computer able to suspend again. As others in this thread said, grub replays all open transactions internally before accessing a file on an unclean reiserfs partition. >From some tests, 2.6.19(.x) seems to keep quite a bunch of open transactions even if I do multiple syncs just before a hard reset or echo >/proc/acpi/sleep on an idle system. I haven't verified against 2.6.18 yet, but there have been some non cosmetical reiserfs updates in 2.6.19. Anyone aware of a change that may cause this behaviour? Stefan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/