Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 9 Feb 2022 05:52:39 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: remove CONFIG_SET_FS
Message-ID: <YgPHJy9NDVFr5s6w@infradead.org>
References: <CAK8P3a22ntk5fTuk6xjh1pyS-eVbGo7zDQSVkn2VG1xgp01D9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220117132757.1881981-1-arnd@kernel.org>
 <CAHTX3dKyAha8_nu=7e413pKr+SAaPBLp9=FTdQ=GZNdjQHW+zA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHTX3dKyAha8_nu=7e413pKr+SAaPBLp9=FTdQ=GZNdjQHW+zA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 02:50:32PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> I can't see any issue with the patch when I run it on real HW.
> Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> 
> Christoph: Is there any recommended test suite which I should run?

No.  For architectures that already didn't use set_fs internally
there is nothing specific to test.  Running some perf or backtrace
tests might be useful to check if the non-faulting kernel helpers
work properly.