Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932991AbXBLPev (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:34:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933006AbXBLPev (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:34:51 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:42565 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933000AbXBLPeu (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:34:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:04:10 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: menage@google.com Cc: akpm@osdl.org, pj@sgi.com, sekharan@us.ibm.com, dev@sw.ru, xemul@sw.ru, serue@us.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rohitseth@google.com, mbligh@google.com, winget@google.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, devel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers Message-ID: <20070212153410.GE7526@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <20070212081521.808338000@menage.corp.google.com> <20070212085104.998727000@menage.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070212085104.998727000@menage.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 626 Lines: 16 On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:27AM -0800, menage@google.com wrote: > This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction > over generic process containers. Forgive my confusion, but do we really need two-levels of resource control abstraction here? Why can't resource controllers directly work with containers (just like cpu accounting does)? -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/