Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030576AbXBMAZy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:25:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030585AbXBMAZy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:25:54 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:39745 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030576AbXBMAZw (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:25:52 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] lguest: trivial guest block driver From: Rusty Russell To: Jens Axboe Cc: Andrew Morton , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , virtualization In-Reply-To: <20070212150125.GM3999@kernel.dk> References: <1171251965.10409.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171252113.10409.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171252219.10409.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171252321.10409.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171252405.10409.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171252474.10409.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070212044339.GJ3685@kernel.dk> <1171258034.10409.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070212053204.GB3999@kernel.dk> <1171264167.10409.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070212150125.GM3999@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:25:05 +1100 Message-Id: <1171326305.19842.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1196 Lines: 32 On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 16:01 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12 2007, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Thanks Jens!! > > My pleasure, it's not often you get to make that big a performance > improvement with just a little few lines of change :-) *cough* I deliberately leave these low hanging fruit in lguest to encourage people to hack on it. Really. *cough* > I guess you'll take changes to make this driver queuing as well? It's > pretty important for good guest io performance as well. The question is whether the guest or host should queue. If you have multiple guests sharing a disk in the hose, I would think that the host is better off queuing. And this would seem to be the common case. On my todo list is: 1) Implement write barriers, (-> fsync in the host) 2) Make the host userspace program (lguest) async rather than blocking, 3) Allow multiple outstanding requests. Then it should be useful for other hypervisors. Cheers! Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/