Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp3789803pxb; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 07:50:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxR0oGfHeL891pCl5A1n5qHUkQ65fcRiuOfc3uHSxO7FLdFORrpfTmapqBZKpnpMUhqq6AF X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:94d0:: with SMTP id d16mr1871488ejy.412.1644594601234; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 07:50:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644594601; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uiLpIq4PLYy7GnJkjF2blTBz84Fr4IMHlfRKEiMe3WAA3zCQCi0jnNUkCGaXGG461J u2py8jYd8+RFJ3VwYXgOxTWrB1PxWrlXtW3ZL53ZvO0xYvUz5WREGHRhJdU5edbSTZb4 FMRXF1W9e38WW2HdlsaRr26vIZJG6aueuyP2N7Tz9M1aD+h/F47JBTezpIc8t9tUOetJ RjKgapveMUjWuQLOoOqy4i+x050di5GdJjJd+wc/XoosuWLTkPgaUtsX7nh/hwixWQYm AKGR0eAvSfdwwM1Lk1NVxjz5+jomFuOOsAXZbZVl6k0H5VmrxD1dgImHIT9l5aSs+V8H hlyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=XeJZQRPtsCyEC0jBz/WLhq6tqoYYavDJpziShZX9UR0=; b=BnSmQ/ZiPmmsAGUpNmK+lfpuZbgEn1QfOAsMp5HxyJsHCqiP0FYzI1ZpMbLuhObM/S e+VMezUzsXvuh597tX+FqQ53z4lSssIsk0GL0NAHR7DSOabcUbQVvOdeL/p9djQUvE39 Fbt7MXz5oFgKksqOwwK3ysDCNq8Cwkr80kGP9JWrx4DjdUlCz1pgxCHbdAF47EZzaBHU +o/e5kPAcsrYl1QSvVlvbaB8TsWsjhpMlvO00XunknPpG2G4nIeFhejgBIQwJhh7qNcq vtfwmAVPuluge4Qyv3MFuS0CLv13VCZyWq+DEb+cXDJoJ/gmEYi0cHdbejwjeelBTRMO zqIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ej14si1190225edb.126.2022.02.11.07.49.35; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 07:50:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347116AbiBKCBh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:01:37 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:57634 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344360AbiBKCBg (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:01:36 -0500 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B745F48 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:01:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:36568) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1nILFd-00BSHq-U6; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:01:33 -0700 Received: from ip68-227-174-4.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.174.4]:52276 helo=email.froward.int.ebiederm.org.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1nILFc-006jmq-Qj; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:01:33 -0700 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: Cc: Alexey Gladkov , Kees Cook , Shuah Khan , Christian Brauner , Solar Designer , Ran Xiaokai , Linux Containers , Michal =?utf-8?Q?Koutn=C3=BD?= References: <20220207121800.5079-1-mkoutny@suse.com> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 20:01:25 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20220207121800.5079-1-mkoutny@suse.com> ("Michal =?utf-8?Q?K?= =?utf-8?Q?outn=C3=BD=22's?= message of "Mon, 7 Feb 2022 13:17:54 +0100") Message-ID: <87o83e2mbu.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-XM-SPF: eid=1nILFc-006jmq-Qj;;;mid=<87o83e2mbu.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.174.4;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19iBzuPMqqn/Nk13JvCCRLIasKl2dLfAfg= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.174.4 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *; X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 359 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (3.1%), b_tie_ro: 10 (2.7%), parse: 1.21 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 3.5 (1.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.09 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.0 (1.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.26 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.00 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 50 (13.9%), check_bayes: 48 (13.5%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.6%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.8%), b_comp_prob: 1.93 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 31 (8.7%), b_finish: 0.85 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 267 (74.4%), check_dkim_signature: 0.50 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.1 (0.9%), poll_dns_idle: 1.32 (0.4%), tests_pri_10: 2.9 (0.8%), tests_pri_500: 8 (2.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH 0/8] ucounts: RLIMIT_NPROC fixes X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michal Koutný recently found some bugs in the enforcement of RLIMIT_NPROC in the recent ucount rlimit implementation. I saw some additional bugs and some cleaner ways to fix the problem so instead of starting with his fixes these are my own. I am aiming to send the first 5 of these to Linus once they have been reviewed. Two more are fixes in principle but I don't think do anything in practice. The last one is just a cleanup to prevent future divergence of RLIMIT_NPROC logic. Eric W. Biederman (8): ucounts: Fix RLIMIT_NPROC regression ucounts: Fix set_cred_ucounts ucounts: Fix and simplify RLIMIT_NPROC handling during setuid()+execve ucounts: Only except the root user in init_user_ns from RLIMIT_NPROC ucounts: Handle wrapping in is_ucounts_overlimit ucounts: Handle inc_rlimit_ucounts wrapping in fork rlimit: For RLIMIT_NPROC test the child not the parent for capabilites ucounts: Use the same code to enforce RLIMIT_NPROC in fork and exec fs/exec.c | 12 +++++------- include/linux/sched.h | 2 +- include/linux/sched/signal.h | 2 ++ kernel/cred.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- kernel/fork.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- kernel/sys.c | 14 -------------- kernel/ucount.c | 3 ++- kernel/user_namespace.c | 2 ++ 8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) Eric