Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp4015342pxb; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:01:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3QNDCJ+0XE5XFD3k/J96iTRBka8nWT1p5tklb84A7nxDvru4RUhv3SXLs5/i1W/jAfj0I X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f685:: with SMTP id l5mr3292956plg.66.1644613307531; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:01:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644613307; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bflFFmBn7z5lsVIcZ8I/Hf89oQG315kps5SeA8NaRjdt0By7iL0/Bi3HTWaXo4zQFM LWYZsQmYYvbYU6/XDf8G1JkJ638EDt3WUDiH7adhCF0GqJemkGv/WqOQRTqhL27D8wgJ iGfSV85GPpw8Bk2p3HNrtuFamHxFEZNB3n3JrnKwUduGgoQrzRKatBEf2Atdc37JjLIU i2tCNCOo5eN7w7o/UDhs2fC6GOJ3ZxgTpbhxCV3OmkVxS4ezlKVy5pT6TtXYj4DO0yjH sQfaOwCv77b72MrJPhgVXapgmKfYbF4nuGnygi1desgVUrit6sJRapr0uNCT44XlLHt8 iPQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=zatJXb7HRv8FMqG1Xo7XP5eEmbDUdN24u8XYZBgStqA=; b=IqwwR2Af6I2DCZ/EhZZe+mND1jG8/YziRevUBRRUkTn7+k3UOLNrfdYn5kWXV+d6KP E/uMI5HxArG0bpdhmCjJ/vV1WDPiEpS4K5RypOoXBq8zGDhDIrIqYVhGPSBrl8pgKW5l D2wE3zbPlIBokAsHzy7lfn+O3wC8KYtn7K3xHStm7Y6oV4bApYCBuxDJ2D2YpzDvgD41 2nyguHQULPKGdUw2zwct5LmwOwqa+EWDjDkBs2mt/+BFG+6IuOnfceq7I09yJ/XwTUUD rtCnzmsCKzGc2pBlNfU1O/KskFfhFx48PjITyZ8T84mvNUa3daDfoPCUjU5vCMiBTlPT wgGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=SXognhXi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qe8si5469932pjb.66.2022.02.11.13.01.32; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:01:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=SXognhXi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343753AbiBKUkc (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:40:32 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:39540 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230259AbiBKUka (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:40:30 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B686CF5 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:40:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1644612029; x=1676148029; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hMLogYdTPwvN7aEbRQDmMTbRpetFKlJo+PCjc3Htt4g=; b=SXognhXi0CDvq8MU6uuX9RkYNbtNYpJafy92aDqEjK+lVEXFrr0Sev5/ 41nW0Aw317JTl6ThxQkTtxfxCWRTNb9KQWsGYwFjJMFPP+LczuZxBihP8 yDu1z4ZUXJVfI4FwMOqNpp/NgoQoTgwO2xE2ANTpXV/3Zjh8LfJkwN0/O GcxBSafkGxNmU0ByMbxvskPDE9sAgUk5T8FTw61enzPI+Ro3sqD9CWL05 ow+5ussW9LjG0CP7DyO10yJe0GK8QTrR9becHxSonSPqlSLWubaKcxFrK j2J9FLGFWH9oMnPITUF1f/l7GzyQaTHTHIG1Oj49HL/scfg+1zggDvF1w w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10255"; a="336228442" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,361,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="336228442" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2022 12:40:28 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,361,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="488738173" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.3.52.147]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2022 12:40:28 -0800 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:40:28 -0800 From: Ira Weiny To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" Cc: "hpa@zytor.com" , "Williams, Dan J" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 18/44] x86/fault: Add a PKS test fault hook Message-ID: <20220211204027.GS785175@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20220127175505.851391-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20220127175505.851391-19-ira.weiny@intel.com> <2a7b0a94ea52952927c29bfc32f0085cbdfe5747.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a7b0a94ea52952927c29bfc32f0085cbdfe5747.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:56:57AM -0800, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 09:54 -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote: > > + * If a protection key exception occurs it could be > > because a PKS test > > + * is running. If so, pks_test_callback() will clear > > the protection > > + * mechanism and return true to indicate the fault > > was handled. > > + */ > > + if (pks_test_callback()) > > + return; > > Why do we need both this and pks_handle_key_fault()? I debated this. And I convinced myself that it was worth the extra code. For this series, when testing pks_handle_key_fault() this may get called if something goes wrong. And when the test code is not configured it is a no-op. So I don't see any harm in keeping this as a general handler. I mentioned this when adding pks_handle_key_fault().[1] I could make a note of it in this patch if that would help. Ira [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220127175505.851391-30-ira.weiny@intel.com/