Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp4068314pxb; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:35:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxg8wM5sSUZR19xPULKdsMxNjrdqYWDuhfcab2g1w7Ib+DifP2bAQiZ3OVbwjFoP1IRfZ2b X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32c3:: with SMTP id i3mr3495096plr.46.1644618902131; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:35:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644618902; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jAbCVPUsX4ikiETbX/A/N0oc4MPXcYoGGujyegdnKAUvO2veHWf9zxLtFLsoRGfxYW ZvdtXAUDvH4XLVIl59wojPamSgIqG2OcJjH8q//eaZr0afUPIVjCDewp2i7E/V9Wk0UU WmUoc2QG+fGLQ1Xe1qoiYA0XlHPN9DhBi3AS+DPtPmUMC8uLAt2/Dhbx93TOQtKeN3f0 j54ySQP5+VEFP/Ai7mr1Gtnrj9IAwQSfxp1FrFeGsTxVXe63qgDDjKCNGPy52osA6YBg NgPBONc1vBJHm2Jv9xoEfaew0hAPwXQFlAtkP+t0u+07bI6DLTowvI8t2Pei0CSkHqs+ yXzQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Gp/zsuHKYh5My8PR8Z8zMLkl9KcvlSL8qBfbEmgIsWo=; b=HVgDJNbMf4ls9dnqxnHsnreMhwn8swcIANlFleIrw9+i1ywlGqvVOnZYDlrHij4ok5 tho0c8+F6VX6ApEjlOJMYVgAi7Fv6IoDSKN2ZUqLH/nXRzN+vpqsRTgzVHnHmAMGhCsA B5MneLY27hOCYXX8r/+zQkrPIRYn8GvLNwrH1sbkpSTT4wQjFQfhMycPVC7ZicYOEzrl kDMRxGyl7csrZqoWMHmGajtOQh7t3YmndesiTNZdixs5kXOhehRIhNdHay/xTDXNj60e GE9IYrl7Kgp/TascJ7uISO5kckA1gA2y8pfKal0dfgayN5F1j5Xmnb9hXLyXtlPBlfA7 0bqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="FbC+aa/J"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v11si9934171pgk.121.2022.02.11.14.34.43; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:35:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="FbC+aa/J"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1354048AbiBKWV4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:21:56 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:55074 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234605AbiBKWVy (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:21:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 522C8D48; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:21:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id 9so15722476pfx.12; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:21:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Gp/zsuHKYh5My8PR8Z8zMLkl9KcvlSL8qBfbEmgIsWo=; b=FbC+aa/JuHHGAUA0o4a7ARROkYlUgtF89jqqv1971NAcrPrUSBCHntXAKxWKY1qSQE AFVRvaMiLhFaWVq4PK+cScT+HTjVT3B+3FYvmez6AKToFoigGVn2E9A3a642mY2KMEj4 5/0tuPl72S/A1jO943oZMmvPk9oa7cBAhbvSI5HhcdfggrFAkt6tK0wEiKe90MFWuKYS 0HDbNhFEBCn7hewZSU0mhtre4vrbPav2md7HpiW4LtrZzxCgBHalGEmdN67mq/xeWXRy U2JluWcMTCjoX1ZOKDB+b1e5XJiTbnrxj+l36UkSk+7fxf9MNZVo8UxJppvmMDayZFro ufOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Gp/zsuHKYh5My8PR8Z8zMLkl9KcvlSL8qBfbEmgIsWo=; b=hPl7DGfSnQWChC+ZGUeLukhiapy1QoNSK0Ud0w7+KGw0HD5b2R4n/tYwOR7lTDq/N/ 4SmQkEMw1LRskN4JO4+4d8xMoEQtBLbJX/f8lY7lANm5q1t3ytIOfVlll6KZHfLDX7vQ +v6S9iivozQNzv9G90YxygdBw5uI5sZjWg3MrFT+DkeA2kR8iXzAwF2EajjCTdqh1I8X qZhaiWjj2eSlA6pttR62Qqb/ySdVkkq18RlPs3EZOn+hImru8G8vMr7aq4nuczZd+GLX BxH/BgyVvZsV6o3e4g61+OjJ7nbiBkoYxLyO0IAS3+vTZTZKOYhms+H/07o2vr7P5AM3 VoHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+/9j+bixYQ58DlN0+fTCM7k+AWxp7Ej6twxlNGTe1vKVRIsyI r7ST+1qtOoxDqfKRZzAym6I= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8d08:: with SMTP id j8mr3616091pfe.68.1644618111742; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:21:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2409:10:24a0:4700:e8ad:216a:2a9d:6d0c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a12sm24442962pfv.18.2022.02.11.14.21.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:21:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 07:21:49 +0900 From: Stafford Horne To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linus Torvalds , Michal Simek , Linux-Arch , LKML , Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Arnd Bergmann , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: remove CONFIG_SET_FS Message-ID: References: <126ae5ee-342c-334c-9c07-c00213dd7b7e@xilinx.com> <87a6exxg7h.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a6exxg7h.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:10:10PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > > > > I had previously gotten stuck at ia64, but gave it another go now > > and uploaded an updated branch with ia64 taken care of and another > > patch to clean up bits afterwards. > > > > I only gave it light testing so far, mainly building the defconfig for every > > architecture. I'll post the series once the build bots are happy with the > > branch overall. > > > > Thank you so much for doing this work. > I'll echo this. Thank you, the changes look good. I test built and booted the OpenRISC architecture and it works. I can drop the openrisc only patch for this from the openrisc queue now. -Stafford