Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp4370438pxb; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 02:53:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzywUOVeGe3ExiCljohN4lsSilgkduw/QQ6yiRUEUub/nCqS4fUciWTjqqNyvnLrBeoSb9V X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5113:: with SMTP id m19mr6113656edd.325.1644663197746; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 02:53:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644663197; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zxEdJ4mIN/eRd2sBW+leet/UuM3+C/c8CL+Dv6VFbWOsFBz0Pl8nCnHg2/VwxllKNh 3Ev+g00haUTPCMsTr55EuVO04cQ2qYDvpdK+CnGfHCwpPUJTQP4NTt8YD9pQBZ448UGP jyNFcGORHoLrkCBML8EHEyyPZtRINx6UjW/H1qur3Y1AkZI1ceJQ7FYk9Z25TsxtUh9a rmeWjrriY5Ghhs5I23XXXkfFvO7lCOnmNinHGI14E76ZBQbpgH4SAxGxQE27PNLl5vSR GAglZuRos31ZiehIMPtN8hfdog22BHKi3f3eE0q4QVTaYqLHQpTT3iWp7RFowcjSRj+h gkYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=sqI38sOGjQkk/kdw5sRYev4nCDxf01vz6fuBqsYp2pU=; b=QD4LRa2H3+Mxp/MowDYl68DZp11F3lbj1NMHOCND61FcQNHu8s46SXgrCAL1aRZ6Oz jzOonX66easLci65fHWDvvM9H9Gz910GQJGzuPa1g4/MURnvKW1DrkOWEUH4O01UA+1G c3vprtO6nooeKTUjG+A+so0V5gyH2smSdosyMGQGuHKhUABrXAL1L8CitXKqQpnXfx3v 94xGKiZaQ+4Rkxi2ULroINdbZ2x7ptwLwPgXe2myjU8E3uIbIsU+isZac9NfBrGWCrBy jnOH7XIh5pFfSvbbI7xMIXfx99L4rpqqsDTCWeaf5JHR+0NWj9is7sxXpehPYIRVh8Nk IsWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=a+M84+b+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ce17si15598865edb.370.2022.02.12.02.52.46; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 02:53:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=a+M84+b+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351550AbiBKVlA (ORCPT + 93 others); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:41:00 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:53318 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233490AbiBKVk6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:40:58 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2499BC66 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:40:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1644615656; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sqI38sOGjQkk/kdw5sRYev4nCDxf01vz6fuBqsYp2pU=; b=a+M84+b+VrNg1HL5y007lLWz0QDRi0vWEMAZ0OJrktibSzn1mjNTBEJZAGeTli+YBEtNwM IEOaMzUqj+leG9PPz1eMIpm2Gcn8TpPpqEnNmM1uyDhhrVTXUwo3u+vGRFj8fa7EWQz+kS VN0X5Tb3WU3ckrOX+YMEe9inporRuUE= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-265-o1z0L8UMPJ6nnHJWwl_VOw-1; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:40:54 -0500 X-MC-Unique: o1z0L8UMPJ6nnHJWwl_VOw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id i188-20020a1c3bc5000000b0037bb9f6feeeso434278wma.5 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sqI38sOGjQkk/kdw5sRYev4nCDxf01vz6fuBqsYp2pU=; b=ZVc7xLp2xJ0gpm8uPDIssX+cydMntRLfUS4XSGyhNYREUzBJB1U/v4q+RdN8Tf6KT2 ad9Cxg/i/wifZ92iycVOWEKIHMpM52Cb+g+MPhiRzE3lHhCKYuoZXcBrorK7tq63L3PC J2BvA4sjGtj3j+ccPGRh+rQOP+g499vLvVd3CIVDtC6VFu2UA9aIWzkMAoA9+WtDL7zw R6ynXragF/utvEI+zndzzLWQv2EnF8KantegA3a0TWK00Vf2D339GHdF/jPmxUEx7SkR 52coOZv09Bw/G8ZEz0qX/Nzw04PaPKkFT9SbalErJZaI0zTa1sM/FvhaZIpqb/yuMZbH w0bA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Tb7Qu8HuX9W5pirqY40XnHQWRPf/HsWRHoHKvc48fqvpAXvMK yHM1XUXllSJE/0maPL/XHbl5iopHmtmx7upX5No4TVDbFCEZsPnZ2Gg+RnwQzpW9/R7v3JlEfO6 Fl4U6On0QPakVcXG+YLi3UApcOTBuQuZ/XtMaehaU X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:156b:: with SMTP id 11mr2805497wrz.467.1644615652998; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:40:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:156b:: with SMTP id 11mr2805493wrz.467.1644615652820; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:40:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220211170522.348999-1-agruenba@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Andreas Gruenbacher Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 22:40:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] gfs2 fixes To: Linus Torvalds Cc: cluster-devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 8:48 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:05 AM Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > > * Revert debug commit that causes unexpected data corruption. > > Well, apparently not just unexpected, but unexplained too. > > That's a bit worrisome. It sounds like the corruption cause is still > there, just hidden by the lack of __cond_resched()? Yes, that's what it looks like. My initial suspicion was that we're somewhere using gfs2_glock_dq() in non-sleepable context when we know that we're not dropping the last reference and so gfs2_glock_dq() won't sleep, but there's no such instance in the code, and testing would also have revealed such cases. The corruption we've seen always affects whole pages/blocks. Maybe it's an ordering / memory barrier issue. Thanks, Andreas