Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 12 Feb 2022 12:24:03 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
        linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: leds: common: fix unit address in
 max77693 example
Message-ID: <20220212112403.GA20866@duo.ucw.cz>
References: <20220111175430.224421-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
 <20220111175430.224421-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
 <783a67ad-ee7e-c75a-a52c-672cd355bd37@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <783a67ad-ee7e-c75a-a52c-672cd355bd37@canonical.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk


--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

> > The max77693 LED device node should not take an unit address, because it
> > is instantiated from a max77693 I2C parent device node.  This also
> > splits all examples to separate DTS examples because they are actually
> > independent.
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.yaml | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >=20
>=20
> This should be part of my max77693 patchset:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220111175017.223966-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@=
canonical.com/
>=20
> Nothing actually depends on this patch. It just fixes a warning which
> will be brought to eyes with mentioned max77693 patchset.
>=20
> Pavel, feel free to take it separately via leds tree. Other way is to
> take it with other max77693 patches (probably via MFD tree).

Ok, let me take it separately. Applied, thanks.

Best regards,
								Pavel
--=20
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCYgeY0wAKCRAw5/Bqldv6
8o0HAJ40rgvnPNaFETKSsK2EgQBHcFZeGgCcCDg/CAOJXwcQ+R3w9N3O8BGULgA=
=RmPe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--