Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp4676436pxb; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 14:06:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHresUKsZVhvCfJgwXsLsFLj101XNa657CdLs5sLv4ZYbLHMuowLLQTTgNBIwvFscrk8+Q X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6888:: with SMTP id n8mr4470241ejr.0.1644703592860; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 14:06:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644703592; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lvOrx2MOn24Rhn9h1VAPFb3/d9CpIvN+pRHZ0zi5+gBPVP9ds4w48NbhD0kMZEN40O FoYPwMpEvFtTLbsxhLUGUnR7rGcfT3f5/pP3bhAYUfeHdY91NAhrJtcySQOc6Wh0Ljht 31VUl6C1bMddpcF5R7g7uctJuNV+VTRB19DxKKX/TcDpPtGze35H8/9bBrtGoN2ilCIx Fyn8aGc8mFNSEFkVnWuhIzj5XD9sf0IEnueCjQAFTK6JD64NqX1M2dtVq1K7mnVQMC1V uddaP6oAjmauIBZoylxkM3MDg1no1Yfp/EwmGvNQ180x6N/rUgGFDh+023iwstWYmVK/ XrgA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:subject:cc:to :from:date; bh=Bb32C/JQ4WDGAGvc96ySpK6ZS9lzSied1OWU8cnfKP0=; b=Tm13a7RM2X1uT5O9HR5uGtjgs1jXmbnk+Ss4HOLS4V1Z10Oc2y5pb0sSU9IA8HYHgO xZUdyUs+YhQQvfkG+mxSmJW+wNOUu4rwNqnpididJd0JLWjHUE3p09Bh1DruC3ALve83 FkP0xKrtarECarjLpmPwbiw/PZe1nsliiFVMZPrHSvZBdEMPAtOsxLZ5ww+24r3Lq+Vw NSci1/bKrplQWvEbOn9lteOeJg4AeasuyBgE2F9RQQfbAvZI1yZ+hnmtO7AYtVM8zxX6 z6x4bObnQ3GOgQu+TPXQSF0xJeNBzoWHTLIYKaOWJb5tzptGNSZZcSCjLqCBOFSrJppO 6hNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b9si9683570ede.136.2022.02.12.14.05.47; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 14:06:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232800AbiBLIlg (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 12 Feb 2022 03:41:36 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:53194 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231820AbiBLIlf (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Feb 2022 03:41:35 -0500 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF8226553; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 00:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id B31B992009E; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 09:41:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF85E92009B; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 08:41:30 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 08:41:30 +0000 (GMT) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby cc: Andy Shevchenko , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] serial: 8250: Correct basic issues with the PCI blacklist Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HDRS_LCASE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, In the course of investigating whether support code for OxSemi PCIe UARTs could be factored out from the common 8250 PCI UART driver, which has been previously requested by Andy (cc-ed), I have noticed that the Kconfig help text for several device-specific UART drivers previously factored out is incorrect in that it claims that those dedicated drivers are required for extra features of the respective devices, while actually the blacklist entries within the common driver make them require those dedicated drivers even for standard features, as the common driver now refuses to handle them. Also it may be unclear for the user from a specific PCI device ID of an affected PCI UART device which dedicated driver has to be configured in to handle it, so make the blacklist entries include that information to be printed if a device is encountered that cannot be handled because its dedicated driver has been excluded from configuration while the common driver refuses to handle it. See the respective change descriptions for further details. Please apply. Maciej