Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211216021938.11752-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> <7fc9348d-5bee-b5b6-4457-6bde1e749422@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <7fc9348d-5bee-b5b6-4457-6bde1e749422@redhat.com>
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:32:45 +0800
Message-ID: <CANRm+CyHfgOyxyk7KPzYR714dQaakPrVbwSf_cyvBMo+vQcmAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Fixes for kvm/queue
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 04:13, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/16/21 03:19, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > Patch 1 and patch 2 are updated version of the original patches with
> > the same title.  The original patches need to be dequeued.  (Paolo has
> > sent the reverting patches to the mail list and done the work, but I
> > haven't seen the original patches dequeued or reverted in the public
> > kvm tree.  I need to learn a bit more how patches are managed in kvm
> > tree.)
>
> This cycle has been a bit more disorganized than usual, due to me taking
> some time off and a very unusual amount of patches sent for -rc.
> Usually kvm/queue is updated about once a week and kvm/next once every
> 1-2 weeks.

Maybe the patch "Revert "KVM: VMX: Save HOST_CR3 in
vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest()"" is still missing in the latest
kvm/queue, I saw the same warning.

    Wanpeng