Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 19:10:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 19:10:22 -0500 Received: from vega.services.brown.edu ([128.148.19.202]:55701 "EHLO vega.brown.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 19:10:06 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001116184203.00b45100@postoffice.brown.edu> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 18:43:20 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Feuer Subject: Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <8v1ng9$omi$1@cesium.transmeta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 06:10 PM 11/16/2000 -0500, you wrote: >Here's one more: you can't rename across the binding boundary. They _are_ >mounts, so they avoid all that crap with loop creation on rename, etc. >Take a generic DAG and try to implement rename() analog on it. Have fun >catching the cases that would make the graph disconnected. How could the graph become disconnected? What does connectedness have to do with naming? -- This message has been brought to you by the letter alpha and the number pi. Open Source: Think locally, act globally. David Feuer David_Feuer@brown.edu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/