From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:11:14 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>, patches@x86-64.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20070212551.664370000@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20070212551.664370000@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200702131611.15172.arnd@arndb.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 674
Lines: 14

On Monday 12 February 2007 17:51, Andi Kleen wrote:
> setcc() in math-emu is written as a gcc extension statement expression
> macro that returns a value. ?However, it's not used that way and it's not
> needed like that, so just make it a do-while non-extension macro so that we
> don't use an extension when it's not needed.
> 

The patch looks good but it doesn't match the description any more, since
you now use a function...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/