Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 13 Feb 2022 23:41:24 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: remove CONFIG_SET_FS
Message-ID: <YgoHpAG0GCdccLZF@infradead.org>
References: <CAK8P3a22ntk5fTuk6xjh1pyS-eVbGo7zDQSVkn2VG1xgp01D9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220117132757.1881981-1-arnd@kernel.org>
 <CAHTX3dKyAha8_nu=7e413pKr+SAaPBLp9=FTdQ=GZNdjQHW+zA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a2Om2SYchx8q=ddkNeJ4o=1MVXD2MFSV2SGJ_vuTUcp0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <126ae5ee-342c-334c-9c07-c00213dd7b7e@xilinx.com>
 <CAK8P3a2zZfFa55nNeMicWHhia7fkT0cJBzYvUi0O+v0B13BOMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YgROuYDWfWYlTUKD@antec>
 <YgWrFnoOOn/B3X4k@antec>
 <CAK8P3a0eAv168eepvdZQbYDstTQHc-Hb2_PMS3bseV3caB4oAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wj7kOxDg+2Ym1EQsTZaZqU-p7aFHiNVOmtEhNS8jjapLQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wj7kOxDg+2Ym1EQsTZaZqU-p7aFHiNVOmtEhNS8jjapLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:46:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Can you say why you didn't convert ia64? I don't see any set_fs() use
> there, except for the unaligned handler, which looks trivial to
> remove. It looks like the only reason for it is kernel-mode unaligned
> exceptions, which we should just turn fatal, I suspect (they already
> get logged).
> 
> And ia64 people could make the unaligned handling do the kernel mode
> case in emulate_load/store_int() - it doesn't look *that* painful.

Are there any ia64 people left? :)