Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750809AbXBMQVH (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:21:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750811AbXBMQVH (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:21:07 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([217.147.92.249]:2943 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750809AbXBMQVG (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:21:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:20:57 +0000 From: Russell King To: Lennart Sorensen Cc: Raphael Assenat , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add PCI device ID for IT8152 RISC-to-PCI chip Message-ID: <20070213162057.GC15227@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Lennart Sorensen , Raphael Assenat , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <45CCD60D.5050001@8d.com> <20070209212856.GK7584@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <45D1CF22.6010706@8d.com> <20070213151633.GL7584@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20070213153029.GB15227@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070213154728.GM7584@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070213154728.GM7584@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1424 Lines: 35 On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:47:28AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:30:29PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:16:33AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > There doesn't seem to be very many > > > arm systems with PCI, so it's hard to tell. > > > > NetWinder, EBSA285 (which the NetWinder is a derivative of), the N2100, > > etc are PCI based and are all well proven in the field. > > Which PCI controller do they use? NetWinder and EBSA285 are DC21285 (footbridge). The N2100 is IOP32x based. As for gluing a PCI bridge to something not designed for PCI (eg, a PXA255) I can't comment. > > (I did consider replacing the Promise UDMA card, but the IT821x card > > I bought to replace it didn't have all the pins on the chip soldered > > down - to the extent that even a PC couldn't recognise the PCI card. > > So I'm running on the assumption that the self-repaired Promise UDMA > > card is all round going to be more reliable than the as yet unproven > > IT821x card.) > > And they shipped a card in that state? Indeed. :( -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/