Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751331AbXBMReg (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:34:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751315AbXBMRef (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:34:35 -0500 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:57287 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751331AbXBMRef (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:34:35 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 8BKD9PBIyq7vrDfaaze/05DHLtPzsjavfsYTSb1JVATA 1171388072 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere From: Ian Kent To: Olivier Galibert Cc: Chuck Ebbert , "Hack inc." , autofs@linux.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070213155405.GA33765@dspnet.fr.eu.org> References: <20070207173414.GA64492@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1170871661.3415.36.camel@raven.themaw.net> <20070207181817.GA75717@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1170901990.3383.18.camel@raven.themaw.net> <1171262594.18376.13.camel@raven.themaw.net> <20070212135749.GA1681@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1171327959.3377.3.camel@raven.themaw.net> <20070213085053.GA74257@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <45D1C61F.9090509@redhat.com> <20070213155405.GA33765@dspnet.fr.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:35:15 +0900 Message-Id: <1171388115.3377.23.camel@raven.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-32.el5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1809 Lines: 48 On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:54 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:07:27AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > Olivier Galibert wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:52:39AM +0900, Ian Kent wrote: > > >> Indeed. > > >> Which kernel can you use? > > >> I believe that 2200 had another problem so can you use an fc5 kernel > > >> later than that? > > > > > > I've ported your patch to 2257 (nothing special, only moved lines), > > > and it seems to work beautifully. I'm enlarging the testing. > > > > > > > If you get the patches into -stable they will end up in Fedora > > kernels automatically. 2288 (based on 2.6.19) is in testing now... > > Don't they require autofs5 to be of any use though? That's not going > to be in fc until it's out of beta I guess. Not really? [raven@fc6 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) [raven@fc6 ~]$ rpm -q autofs autofs-5.0.1-0.rc3.16 [raven@fc6 ~]$ rpm -q --changelog autofs| head -10 * Sun Feb 11 2007 Ian Kent - 5.0.1-0.rc3.16 - update the "task done race" patch to fix a deadlock. * Wed Feb 07 2007 Ian Kent - 5.0.1-0.rc3.14 - fix race when setting task done (bz 227268). * Tue Jan 30 2007 Ian Kent - 5.0.1-0.rc3.12 - make double quote handing consistent (at least as much as we can). - fix handling of trailing white space in wildcard lookup (forward port bz 199720). - check fqdn of each interface when matching export access list (bz 213700). [raven@fc6 ~]$ The Rawhide or FC-6 srpm should build fine on FC5. Ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/