Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:05:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:05:35 -0500 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:35113 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:05:22 -0500 From: "Pedro M. Rodrigues" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Weimer Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 00:04:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Journaling pointless with today's hard disks? Message-ID: <3C0035A2.24075.FFE9A8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20011124184119.C12133@emma1.emma.line.org> (Matthias Andree's message of "Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:41:19 +0100") In-Reply-To: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've always favoured IBM disks in all my hardware, from enterprise external scsi raid hardware to small ide hardware raid devices (3ware fyi). At home all my four disks are IBM (two DTLA). But with your information it seems i have been bitten by that problem twice at the same time. Several months ago a less zealous system administrator, while shutting down a couple servers for maintenance at night, made a mistake in the console kvm switch, and pushed the red button on a live server with four DTLA IBM disks plugged to a 3ware raid card. On recovery, and after some time, one of the volumes started complaining about errors, and went into degraded mode. One of the disks was clearly broken we thought. So we exchanged it, but alas a couple hours later another one in another volume complained. We also exchanged that one and rebuilt everything. After checking the disks with IBM drive fitness software both presented bad blocks that were recovered with a low level format. I dismissed the events as something weird, but with some logical explanation beyond my grasp. Now all makes sense. /Pedro On 24 Nov 2001 at 20:20, Florian Weimer wrote: > Matthias Andree writes: > > > However, if it's really true that DTLA drives and their successor > > corrupt blocks (generate bad blocks) on power loss during block > > writes, these drives are crap. > > They do, even IBM admits that (on > > http://www.cooling-solutions.de/dtla-faq > > you find a quote from IBM confirming this). IBM says it's okay, you > have to expect this to happen. So much for their expertise in making > hard disks. This makes me feel rather dizzy (lots of IBM drives in > use). > > -- > Florian Weimer Florian.Weimer@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE > University of Stuttgart http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/ > RUS-CERT +49-711-685-5973/fax > +49-711-685-5898 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line > "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to > majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at > http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/