Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp5945683pxb; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:21:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwkajtPtS9ZaO1JcA/1dwd6OUv9FjmOMw24dIAQwxKHu0I8WIAfHcR3qCH09NYBcWMXDOV X-Received: by 2002:a63:8048:: with SMTP id j69mr449176pgd.370.1644866481411; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:21:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644866481; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t0iMZhHWfoaki3nasEwiNYiTV/FCOWC9oUZU0ZUGHp6JoV/q1eFNgiBbeKuZ2MMHfB jtnLfbV6mJ+a8lbnLyNLyzHymRI/8Ikec9QYT7+3XWs9u+AADcZ987542nA36nIPdNG7 6vCjBRFAYTz7Lcn/G3088OW8qwnSUwc4ht1NVBweoWc+H71p5AOzdyh4jvDaqG0mO8ED 1jOUuS8+U+IaaIz2ztf2cM4oUJIfmfzkhE5Gj+MX5AV3hdB1aD7MtgSBePm2DmgP0Blp atsIB+Lha4nwCH/8/puEwtQLuCeXKLbLhDUyi6rSv4ytT3Tvjw/GNQggXTq61xXScD5n AZZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=QFlqcPiEKv0qtNVwDc6W6BQkv44MUlM6bddSZzWyiYw=; b=fDKDf+oPI6+2Ff9u+lEWlPFStQyFtEMPz6QVGv0GyhwHevENnDOmIWx360/uK715nd u9SIORh0iMu2RqWUPaFixaqmxrTTthK8klFmNTKKfoLhvdE1GxpUVPCf5edXwxthyuJw CGIJNSMwji35kxo/bccPtLUPUrGqq4wEyW2q+uQ3oYMlHTRnIlcafanR3uhkupdacWXk /tI9Su1UYqemUtAzgGxoZn0lJCKnxaAVK3kFpiZhDtmF8tu+vXYtj2hpc3SXK21lBS0x il0hM8RtdC/qx26sUfOZvUtRy5yxcJNk1anXgC8z0RF82O2+PFI8O7NCJShc6L/NVsES DFCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Mrqn5vxF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o10si3014491plk.138.2022.02.14.11.21.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:21:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Mrqn5vxF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F7DBF517; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:12:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356645AbiBNQht (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:37:49 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:43224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1356578AbiBNQh2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:37:28 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76F536515C; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:37:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F4E61503; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EC10C340F2; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:37:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1644856633; bh=xPmHkcOVS/yITVJeEntOUBw+xw68iqOnYa2twIOtXYc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Mrqn5vxFjvUagN2pKvxkJBJGliaoy6MP0jFoyX87gnr3XzjUW97zOF2byukzKb7wT E7NJtDKT5zv31VRqv+qj0too8+wx5sD0RyH+MTT+msOF1jPOFyDDNvVoSgFUoy9QLD t5Lsiozlst1R3n+nWulzcvj+OboDpu885ft5vvuvmiKpyr9q37jLxwtuRMARpqWsIO GBpyEJ9KSTjS3eJz1YtPZ5AEx/LAzduOaPtX9npuQqJUzyrgXxlnqYD2lkogyB5K3z 8L8gKn2P4XZBENc6TnX7Y3RkjeTuj5E4MW+PVjIdx+wEaJHxpbaxGjuVjNKLr8MOwo NPAYqCu6fVtxg== From: Arnd Bergmann To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com, green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Subject: [PATCH 08/14] arm64: simplify access_ok() Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:34:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20220214163452.1568807-9-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arnd Bergmann arm64 has an inline asm implementation of access_ok() that is derived from the 32-bit arm version and optimized for the case that both the limit and the size are variable. With set_fs() gone, the limit is always constant, and the size usually is as well, so just using the default implementation reduces the check into a comparison against a constant that can be scheduled by the compiler. On a defconfig build, this saves over 28KB of .text. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 28 +++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h index 357f7bd9c981..e8dce0cc5eaa 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ #include #include +static inline int __access_ok(const void __user *ptr, unsigned long size); + /* * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address. * Returns 1 if the range is valid, 0 otherwise. @@ -33,10 +35,8 @@ * This is equivalent to the following test: * (u65)addr + (u65)size <= (u65)TASK_SIZE_MAX */ -static inline unsigned long __access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size) +static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size) { - unsigned long ret, limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX - 1; - /* * Asynchronous I/O running in a kernel thread does not have the * TIF_TAGGED_ADDR flag of the process owning the mm, so always untag @@ -46,27 +46,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long s (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD || test_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR))) addr = untagged_addr(addr); - __chk_user_ptr(addr); - asm volatile( - // A + B <= C + 1 for all A,B,C, in four easy steps: - // 1: X = A + B; X' = X % 2^64 - " adds %0, %3, %2\n" - // 2: Set C = 0 if X > 2^64, to guarantee X' > C in step 4 - " csel %1, xzr, %1, hi\n" - // 3: Set X' = ~0 if X >= 2^64. For X == 2^64, this decrements X' - // to compensate for the carry flag being set in step 4. For - // X > 2^64, X' merely has to remain nonzero, which it does. - " csinv %0, %0, xzr, cc\n" - // 4: For X < 2^64, this gives us X' - C - 1 <= 0, where the -1 - // comes from the carry in being clear. Otherwise, we are - // testing X' - C == 0, subject to the previous adjustments. - " sbcs xzr, %0, %1\n" - " cset %0, ls\n" - : "=&r" (ret), "+r" (limit) : "Ir" (size), "0" (addr) : "cc"); - - return ret; + return likely(__access_ok(addr, size)); } -#define __access_ok __access_ok +#define access_ok access_ok #include -- 2.29.2