Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:49:48 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
        Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
        Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] iommu: Use right way to retrieve iommu_ops
Message-ID: <YgpP7AhY5hd/DX/C@8bytes.org>
References: <20220214015538.2828933-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20220214015538.2828933-8-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220214015538.2828933-8-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:55:35AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> +static inline const struct iommu_ops *dev_iommu_ops(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Assume that valid ops must be installed if iommu_probe_device()
> +	 * has succeeded. The device ops are essentially for internal use
> +	 * within the IOMMU subsystem itself, so we should be able to trust
> +	 * ourselves not to misuse the helper.
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ON(!dev || !dev->iommu || !dev->iommu->iommu_dev ||
> +		!dev->iommu->iommu_dev->ops);

There is no need for this WARN_ON, the code will oops anyway when one of
the pointers checked here is NULL.