Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:33:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:33:10 -0500 Received: from mnh-1-12.mv.com ([207.22.10.44]:14596 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:32:55 -0500 Message-Id: <200111250050.TAA06745@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: Pavel Machek Cc: Adam Feuer , Alan Cox , Swsusp mailing list , ACPI mailing list , kernel list , Gabor Kuti Subject: Re: [swsusp] Re: swsusp for 2.4.14 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:46:40 GMT." <20011123134639.A55@toy.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:50:42 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org pavel@suse.cz said: > Yep, its doable, but way harder than other ports where you only have > to restore CPU registers. And yes it would be cool. Yeah, Linux has a lot more "processor state" than the typical physical CPU. And I agree it would be very cool. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/