Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:33:53 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
        Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Provide and use generic_handle_irq_safe() where
 appropriate.
Message-ID: <YgvH4ROUQVgusBdA@linutronix.de>
References: <20220211181500.1856198-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <Ygu6UewoPbYC9yPa@google.com>
 <Ygu9xtrMxxq36FRH@linutronix.de>
 <YgvD1HpN2oyalDmj@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YgvD1HpN2oyalDmj@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-02-15 15:16:36 [+0000], Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> 
> > On 2022-02-15 14:36:01 [+0000], Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Do we really need to coordinate this series cross-subsystem?
> > 
> > I would suggest to merge it via irq subsystem but I leave the logistics
> > to tglx.
> 
> Could you answer by other questions too please?

I don't think that I can answer them. I said I leave the logistics to
tglx.

This can go via one merge via irq. This can also go differently i.e.
feature branch on top of 5.17-rc1 (with 1/7) which is merge into each
subsystem and then the "feature" on top.

Either way it remains bisect-able since each driver is changed
individually. There is no need to merge them in one go but since it is
that small it probably makes sense. But I don't do the logistics here.

Sebastian