Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:7420:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hk32csp83462pxb; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:53:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqJQVTPNzdsOaifxbnyVki0uPmWL2Cg1dHARgmdEUSqCZd2EUaTOg/1Xymm694KIkCMpFI X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cc06:: with SMTP id q6mr5051627edt.44.1644944005404; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:53:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644944005; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jGgMGoX3m0JsU1vmXIrU3E99u7VpGt9PQNOusbqkv+m7yJlq9De0ZyDn9vkLdhmAn1 DcdRB7Tg5CVZ8WUfr9Z/eLrZTBJMGlNygaOfJmPE9VFQvopK4TpRAfkX9KPBUKxZxOh2 rFJblujEZMM0MnZk8+JlZ7bnJvZGyz1a0o1oyncyj6USjkJ96eyGLgKAOYz0YufAInsO npm1g42FJezPF8JOdOW2Q7+g/PQ/DU6KvyatreUhIO0lTHum4sKPJDmHmCt6jz43PoXZ m7g5fIssjpw3tFBeccJQn0eucIFN2+hB8klR6t20o0D+OaNxT9WdI/XKaHp788FQpY5E REJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=4AlrkeeOh0/Ufcc3UhsLjdJdRVpoM+riWwT9RuQlIRU=; b=vSdDy2a3X0d4PyZDzPwgm01dhZ/XIOz9byaT+5mrMmNFSICwAcLcvhYL3s/ixryioq SyuhpgliwmkzV8Ro0aF7Ca8Yc3lZBVP5qSGhi2yC7Uh+DmIt/qFwtTS7mO8ZVG3VLIEK gqpPuHdw/7kGKYzsc5Nz7MAJD6zPhJtANTWRzzhrEsk2hsn29Zwpo3i6A4h3W16ZyX0M gK9raW/krnwyZMQveMyS1z7efW+GGKtCq/n03zFtEapN9BOYNQwBviJJK2sMNhsbTSgW lKYFcuuHxEMRE5XIM46TMlvImE0dy1ABbyjIQKSjQmIBBKUN+XiW51lFAdxa0R75F48o B/mg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=d0pWAwFc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hb41si12256774ejc.258.2022.02.15.08.53.02; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:53:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=d0pWAwFc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241551AbiBOQ1G (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:27:06 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:33402 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241546AbiBOQ1F (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:27:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CEA766F95 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id h14-20020a17090a130e00b001b88991a305so3440687pja.3 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:26:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4AlrkeeOh0/Ufcc3UhsLjdJdRVpoM+riWwT9RuQlIRU=; b=d0pWAwFclxXSjZn3YA4K8V/CwPcWGI1yTN7bKBa+B683NUF8r5WKYsm+VGWk7Vqaez eTDpe4b4sWabolPl84kzQWLnIryk75cvpwhx2vHaq12wHPi7IgJ+ljgw5QChAU6b5KGs MUQQtkJ/4tjH/8foiyaxX4P+jQnNGaAQ0nH+3PY2H8gezxYZRMALMexDENJVdWb+uMVo c4aV+Hs0FpOVSU4MRhW+Rmo3C9OAtWlmSmAe/5zkGSHJNUI7lEIjhFjcy2ltYGPlx4Rz 2UFm0jzGVjjjUg9G6lONM41KO33LGQH0Mh/CJNrLs7WjgctuadQu5dImAX0RerSwTTAY C2/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4AlrkeeOh0/Ufcc3UhsLjdJdRVpoM+riWwT9RuQlIRU=; b=35v20skVu49urNWGENljn/vbO8Qitd3GPqnTnc5hmRToydasNO1B53Lr4a7W/bAXe/ jLymc3L5FTpMLEB9YWoa8nHtl9TOIfa0JNZqGgpos8aYvujR/QVRClX2cSW9HqH07+Z/ GQkIKZK9EQCkILwPoksNqYLTjKuxnRd5343JOr21+uRIi2Dsk7ZP4OhSUQQNMb8m0uju GNMaTeXerfFmLaEr1UZXeVtapT5+E+pp9sUGiIgmBwulSF5VFyAgRvZjkr5hJJMaAiFl AiBWHS+tPtQmroujpGVHz64rMkVapbNEhbNccQQsotZJxdc9BDjK176sXZRUxiYvtUvc XTYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531S5kqNt1aDwK8awGTEL9KkHLgH1oVS6RdDMmM+2rcEObJsN0iH 7xA+pvSgPQIvVQ3h4vEH7WkwpcqarmSz3g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ed89:: with SMTP id e9mr5235867plj.88.1644942412865; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:26:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm20404223pfv.158.2022.02.15.08.26.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:26:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:26:48 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Wanpeng Li Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix lockdep false negative during host resume Message-ID: References: <1644920142-81249-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1644920142-81249-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 15, 2022, Wanpeng Li wrote: > From: Wanpeng Li > > I saw the below splatting after the host suspended and resumed. > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2943 at kvm/arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:5531 kvm_resume+0x2c/0x30 [kvm] > CPU: 0 PID: 2943 Comm: step_after_susp Tainted: G W IOE 5.17.0-rc3+ #4 > RIP: 0010:kvm_resume+0x2c/0x30 [kvm] > Call Trace: > > syscore_resume+0x90/0x340 > suspend_devices_and_enter+0xaee/0xe90 > pm_suspend.cold+0x36b/0x3c2 > state_store+0x82/0xf0 > kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b6/0x260 > new_sync_write+0x258/0x370 > vfs_write+0x33f/0x510 > ksys_write+0xc9/0x160 > do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > lockdep_is_held() can return -1 when lockdep is disabled which triggers > this warning. Let's use lockdep_assert_not_held() which can detect > incorrect calls while holding a lock and it also avoids false negatives > when lockdep is disabled. > Fixes: 2eb06c306a57 ("KVM: Fix spinlock taken warning during host resume") > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li > --- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > index 83c57bcc6eb6..3f861f33bfe0 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -5528,7 +5528,7 @@ static void kvm_resume(void) > { > if (kvm_usage_count) { > #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP The #ifdef can be dropped, it was added only to omit the WARN_ON. With that, Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson > - WARN_ON(lockdep_is_held(&kvm_count_lock)); > + lockdep_assert_not_held(&kvm_count_lock); > #endif > hardware_enable_nolock(NULL); > } > -- > 2.25.1 >