Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220214042538.12132-1-potin.lai@quantatw.com> <20220214042538.12132-6-potin.lai@quantatw.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220214042538.12132-6-potin.lai@quantatw.com>
From:   Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 05:48:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CACPK8Xf5W4h=dcBg_Pe1zjXUK73h8YH1tfL4RvoxV3DVsCL90g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] arch: arm: dts: bletchley: switch to spi-gpio
 for spi2
To:     Potin Lai <potin.lai@quantatw.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
        Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 04:26, Potin Lai <potin.lai@quantatw.com> wrote:
>
> Switch to spi-gpio driver to avoid unstable signal issue with EVT HW
>
> Signed-off-by: Potin Lai <potin.lai@quantatw.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts
> index b01f1e7adb81..3c54e4a892c9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts
> @@ -227,8 +227,16 @@
>
>  &spi2 {
>         status = "okay";
> -       pinctrl-names = "default";
> -       pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_spi2_default>;
> +
> +       compatible = "spi-gpio";

This is a bit strange. You're effectively rewriting the node with a new one.

It would make more sense to leave spi2 disabled (the default), and add
a new node:

 spi {
   compatible = "spi-gpio";
   #address-cells = <1>;
   #size-cells = <0>;
   gpio-sck = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(X, 3) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
   gpio-mosi = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(X, 4) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
   gpio-miso = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(X, 5) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
   num-chipselects = <1>;
  cs-gpios = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(X, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;

   flash@0 {
       status = "okay";

etc.

Your new spi node doesn't need the pinctrl or clock properties.

> +       #address-cells = <1>;
> +       #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +       gpio-sck = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(X, 3) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +       gpio-mosi = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(X, 4) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +       gpio-miso = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(X, 5) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +       num-chipselects = <1>;
> +       cs-gpios = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(X, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>
>         flash@0 {
>                 status = "okay";
> --
> 2.17.1
>