Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932193AbXBNKss (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:48:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932196AbXBNKss (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:48:48 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.238]:51369 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932193AbXBNKsr (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:48:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vd+0F1yEoIla1vcJsQJngVHd5tvQCExl7WY0srRSSlB6dwcpJgqWucEM7oMydZOK1WDB6UkaBD8CLmvJ9mPtOhgjqSZrkGR5i8mBDaf62JZJhgEMMPNMETsBJvGVwYaX3WA2JGwFdJnwiuMfUloFm46lJhKqDpJqo4WXIfk4+SQ= Message-ID: <8d158e1f0702140248h63d99e3hdf4ccc155f5fdef6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:48:45 +0100 From: "Patrick Ale" To: "Ramy M. Hassan" Subject: Re: xfs internal error on a new filesystem Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ahmed El Zein" In-Reply-To: <20070214102432.6346.qmail@info6.gawab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070214102432.6346.qmail@info6.gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1630 Lines: 40 On 2/14/07, Ramy M. Hassan wrote: > Hello, > We got the following xfs internal error on one of our production servers: Hi, I want firstly to make a disclaimer that I am not an XFS or kernel guru, what I am writing now is purely my experience, since I use XFS on all my machines, on different disks and all. I encountered the problem you have now, twice over the past three years. Once it was caused by a faulty disk where the 8MB cache on the disk was faulty, causing corruption, and one time it was cause of, what seems to be, a CPU that couldnt handle XFS. This sounds illogical, and to me too, honestly, but the explanation I got was that XFS writes are quite CPU intensive, especialy when you write with 500MB/s and we tried to do this on a PII-400Mhz. I tried reiserfs aswell, and I honestly cant give you one reason to switch back to it. I love XFS, always did, its fast and reliable. Problems that I had were never related to XFS but to hardware that had to deal with XFS in a way (CPU/disk). And, xfs_repair DID repair my filesystems, the data was on the disks, and valid, XFS just shut down my filesystem cause it found my journal not reliable/corrupted. Again, please be aware that I am just a regular user who likes to play around with linux and the kernel, I am no expert in the field of XFS or its relations. I hope this helps you a bit. Patrick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/