Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932274AbXBNN2q (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:28:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932279AbXBNN2q (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:28:46 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.237]:17058 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932274AbXBNN2p (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:28:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=QUSg7fwNwtAso9Xf9jtEwgBVYtOkJEqtVVOte1OmtagRdXBp0hOi6ksMRIsb0W07C5htVgXaD7jmjsX6i34DBCio8kb+JQ4UcBufoF0zUJPv/q0VA9mOLtYAuq6Jw3CuejFkq9GiHLii70cCUDRdot5qRIbUh0lm49FmfzsAFZM= Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:28:34 +0200 To: Mark Brown Cc: Tim Hockin , Jeff Garzik , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] natsemi: Add support for using MII port with no PHY Message-ID: <20070214132834.GA4436@Ahmed> References: <20070214100203.413293000@sirena.org.uk> <20070214100226.540001000@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070214100226.540001000@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1255 Lines: 38 On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:02:04AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > Signed-Off-By: Mark Brown > [...] > - if (np->phy_addr_external == PHY_ADDR_NONE) { > + /* If we're ignoring the PHY it doesn't matter if we can't > + * find one. */ > + if (!np->ignore_phy && np->phy_addr_external == PHY_ADDR_NONE) { [...] > + if (!np->ignore_phy) { > + /* The link status field is latched: it remains low > + * after a temporary link failure until it's read. We > + * need the current link status, thus read twice. > + */ > + mdio_read(dev, MII_BMSR); > + bmsr = mdio_read(dev, MII_BMSR); [...] > /* > + * If we're ignoring the PHY then autoneg and the internal > + * transciever are really not going to work so don't let the > + * user select them. > + */ > + if (np->ignore_phy && (ecmd->autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE || A trivial comment actually, Is there a point to write multi-line comments in two different formats ? Thanks, -- Ahmed S. Darwish http://darwish-07.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/