Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Message-ID: <04c8042a-9aab-332f-6607-44b60be9f514@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:56:22 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Cc:     baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
        Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
        Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] iommu cleanup and refactoring
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
References: <20220214015538.2828933-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <YgpjzNtQlOdq+1AB@8bytes.org>
 <1d817995-f89b-a1de-6aff-9a2bfe91367f@linux.intel.com>
 <YgtvrJ2eIUV+U84u@8bytes.org>
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <YgtvrJ2eIUV+U84u@8bytes.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2/15/22 5:17 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Baolu,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:05:42AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Do you want me to send a new version with below changes:
>>
>> - Remove WARN_ON() in dev_iommu_ops();
>> - Merge above two patches.
>>
>> Or, you can change above yourself?
> 
> Please make the changes and send a new version. I will apply it to the
> iommu core branch then. The build-tests with this patch-set went well
> and I havn't spotted anything else in my review, so I think it is in
> good shape for linux-next testing.

Sure and done.

Best regards,
baolu