Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:32:24 -0500
From:   Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@collabora.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Dynamically allocate pm_domains
Message-ID: <Ygwp+LDliCnbkMZQ@maud>
References: <20220214203132.4722-1-alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
 <CAL_JsqKdb0_N252hR=iv3Lpi6T9+iCRBwzBQhS7UQGFNhM5k=A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKdb0_N252hR=iv3Lpi6T9+iCRBwzBQhS7UQGFNhM5k=A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

> I'd do the oneliner changing it to 5 and be done with it. That being
> said, we have plenty of examples of doing this both ways, so whatever
> makes people happy.

Excellent, that's the patch I wrote originally :-)

Dropping this patch, unless Angelo (or someone else) strongly objects.