Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:7420:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hk32csp27042pxb; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:40:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyq3ENsU8V3uOTlrrYRVZZOetBrVIm1oBz5iUjVQVrInjXfJOokJYf2GJJdmLleQwXdufN4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d502:b0:14b:4520:9380 with SMTP id b2-20020a170902d50200b0014b45209380mr1270681plg.53.1645072846992; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:40:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1645072846; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g9ZzNbqXHubDo7zjQHjDPUP7e0Mu3klyLNhCyjtklolPo7x/bc7IauN0Kqmz/SY8wn 0a7zXJfztembQt99jVGNtVGOtudzhe/mEU2d8h5WOfV5+0SLPC7QIVEHtwybhSh6C+mO EUMUFqw6DGDofnKXvrmU460SvQF1VYe4jssbypGjOaQ3YjZ8l/l2S28I4dcuORx5wW6o DcPZ0QitYZrQufKyTcftQ1DPV7VJeT8C5umAoX4IKNkaAR8O9sMx5UN1/JitPeFBms4j lPoenLZ77FjMdvyv8oMnFQZanpQNLaqvXibH4CnM/FF8DoL0y8qfHW1Ynx6u7ONdvy8G /4Wg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject :cc:to:from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=z6eRmy0xNlN2fdKPLYv2w1ctFFL+lJF1HVKt4VFf25I=; b=RdnJwqsYJwTyLNuTgpMMlJ9UZS5U8wJchHkly4JMvfSlX200wCng75+9cHfnbagRJu Jij+ETI7Uh4qR2RmJtVkpcPkpSTK4oHJISfZ9YcAA3wyk8DqRl0HNnK8xQG7Rfbu+PXX vXPJu7dm6+q/xGOCMc+mw1YeuOfWP6XsS97CrrUPP8QDAm6Oy/gqP2bjcuEVaHNxJeD0 n4rbPJJVYTYqoB7+0Qr6ErQ0eYeAa+d6xa8OWqgEvjtla3MRaeeBAqjt692wjWcNx8nu G7eIh8NCRopCKMJF195xSwDFERcFNvPeOczMQXjnT5rq4p0Y4NihGL3AsFuEMqS6p7wq LX4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=y+Vz5nmT; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=77MwZlgf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b11si734449pji.139.2022.02.16.20.40.20; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=y+Vz5nmT; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=77MwZlgf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232062AbiBQC5x (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:57:53 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:53168 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232045AbiBQC5v (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:57:51 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA886B12F3; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 18:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4134D1F383; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:57:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1645066656; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z6eRmy0xNlN2fdKPLYv2w1ctFFL+lJF1HVKt4VFf25I=; b=y+Vz5nmTyJNuiQEeFMHKyZ7LDH8M+5jd2outxvMTt0Pq7fjTBQ7JJ/9Cq0VhNLFILStZIV X4D6G+5sKivNtkFgRADy3rH8tu3qAjeowmKAC7vX0fCJB2ggVYe7zus+iTYkYomZ5KLFdN 88K8z4qHbpqb/jCoDu40UrASh3eluQ8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1645066656; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z6eRmy0xNlN2fdKPLYv2w1ctFFL+lJF1HVKt4VFf25I=; b=77MwZlgfpUOMcqYFWIWY2ePHl3tmJhJLc/klj49UTzzu+N9w2cvbBxZAuNjMYyWLXWSKih zb+t6zs3/WQNDDBQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE6013B3A; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id AtNqFp65DWIuKgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:57:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "NeilBrown" To: "Stanislav Levin" Cc: "Ian Kent" , autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] autofs 5.1.8 release In-reply-to: References: , <164444398868.27779.4643380819577932837@noble.neil.brown.name>, Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:57:26 +1100 Message-id: <164506664650.10228.15450975168088794628@noble.neil.brown.name> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Stanislav Levin wrote: > > > This seems duplicate of https://www.spinics.net/lists/autofs/msg02389.html > Yes it is - thanks for the link. I wonder why the proposed fix isn't in git .... Also, I cannot see that the new NS4_ONLY_REQUESTED is different from the existing NFS4_VERS_MASK. They are both set/cleared at exactly the same places. Thanks, NeilBrown