Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:21:35 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [REPOST PATCH v4 13/13] drm/msm/dsi: Add support for
 DSC configuration
Message-ID: <Yg4otzVk3HlA8rlE@matsya>
References: <20220210103423.271016-1-vkoul@kernel.org>
 <20220210103423.271016-14-vkoul@kernel.org>
 <20220217092707.2bfzga74xyicl4kb@SoMainline.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220217092707.2bfzga74xyicl4kb@SoMainline.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Marijn,

On 17-02-22, 10:27, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> Vinod,
> 
> On 2022-02-10 16:04:23, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > When DSC is enabled, we need to configure DSI registers accordingly and
> > configure the respective stream compression registers.
> > 
> > Add support to calculate the register setting based on DSC params and
> > timing information and configure these registers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> 
> I supplied a rather extensive - yet merely scratching the surface -
> review of this patch in:
> 
>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211211000315.pavmcc7cc73ilb6l@SoMainline.org/

Sorry somehow I seem to have overlooked this one.
> 
> It seems none of those points have been addressed, bar creating a mesa
> MR to update dsi.xml with a subpar description of the registers (offsets
> only).

Mesa MR was planned as we get more closer to having reviews.

> For every point that is intentionally ignored, please at least supply a
> justification of why you think this is the right thing to do.

Ofcourse, i will reply to these now and address as required.

-- 
~Vinod