Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:48:05 +0200
From:   Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To:     Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Separate wakeref tracking
Message-ID: <Yg5gJfSJCCaY5JYs@intel.com>
References: <20220217140441.1218045-1-andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
 <20220217140441.1218045-7-andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20220217140441.1218045-7-andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:04:38PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> -static noinline depot_stack_handle_t
> +static intel_wakeref_t
>  track_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>  {
> -	depot_stack_handle_t stack, *stacks;
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	if (rpm->no_wakeref_tracking)
> -		return -1;
> -
> -	stack = __save_depot_stack();
> -	if (!stack)
> +	if (!rpm->available)
>  		return -1;

no_wakeref_tracking != available

-- 
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel