Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:34:07 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
        peterz@infradead.org, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
        aarcange@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        david@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, jgross@suse.com,
        jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
        knsathya@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, sdeep@vmware.com,
        tony.luck@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/29] TDX Guest: TDX core support
Message-ID: <Yg5q742GsjCRHXZL@zn.tnic>
References: <YgOoId+vyd1VhIqQ@zn.tnic>
 <20220210004831.03dea501738bee060003d040@intel.com>
 <YgOr6tZjsooJgAi9@zn.tnic>
 <YgPwwI2+16/7jQC4@google.com>
 <YgQR/S67Fqz9PanR@zn.tnic>
 <YgQfGKXOemtXnFau@google.com>
 <YgQl6Uk9rONgv9+F@zn.tnic>
 <20220216154809.w27bt6oi3ql4ssip@black.fi.intel.com>
 <Yg5nh1RknPRwIrb8@zn.tnic>
 <20220217152613.chm4zh7564ddzijq@black.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220217152613.chm4zh7564ddzijq@black.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 06:26:13PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Okay, so on TDX guest side I would have
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c => arch/x86/coco/tdx.c

Right, and to answer a previous question: if that file starts becoming
too huge and unwieldy then we should split it, by all means. What I
don't like is getting a bunch of small files with no good reason why.

> arch/x86/kernel/tdcall.S => arch/x86/coco/tdcall.S
> arch/x86/kernel/tdxcall.S => arch/x86/virt/tdxcall.S
> 
> The last one going to be used by TDX host as well to define SEMACALL
> helper.
> 
> Looks good?

Right, that looks neat.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette