Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:51:01 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>,
        x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        zhangqiao22@huawei.com, tj@kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fix yet more sched_fork() races
Message-ID: <Yg4MdYLBqiw8zFaF@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <Ygj7feK+vdtPw6zj@zn.tnic>
 <CAHk-=wiHUWHHcPLCvyXQKf2wbL3L1SOQSGVuCdf-py6QZGnuqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <YgoWoh6pIzlsQx6d@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <YgoeCbwj5mbCR0qA@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YgoeCbwj5mbCR0qA@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:16:57AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Zhang, Tadeusz, TJ, how does this look?

*sigh* I was hoping for some Tested-by, since I've no idea how to
operate this cgroup stuff properly.

Anyway, full patch below. I'll go stick it in sched/urgent.

---
Subject: sched: Fix yet more sched_fork() races
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:16:57 +0100

Where commit 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an
invalid sched_task_group") fixed a fork race vs cgroup, it opened up a
race vs syscalls by not placing the task on the runqueue before it
gets exposed through the pidhash.

Commit 13765de8148f ("sched/fair: Fix fault in reweight_entity") is
trying to fix a single instance of this, instead fix the whole class
of issues, effectively reverting this commit.

Fixes: 4ef0c5c6b5ba ("kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group")
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/sched/task.h |    4 ++--
 kernel/fork.c              |   13 ++++++++++++-
 kernel/sched/core.c        |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/sched/task.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ extern asmlinkage void schedule_tail(str
 extern void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu);
 
 extern int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p);
-extern void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p,
-			    struct kernel_clone_args *kargs);
+extern void sched_cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *p, struct kernel_clone_args *kargs);
+extern void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p);
 extern void sched_dead(struct task_struct *p);
 
 void __noreturn do_task_dead(void);
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -2266,6 +2266,17 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_stru
 		goto bad_fork_put_pidfd;
 
 	/*
+	 * Now that the cgroups are pinned, re-clone the parent cgroup and put
+	 * the new task on the correct runqueue. All this *before* the task
+	 * becomes visible.
+	 *
+	 * This isn't part of ->can_fork() because while the re-cloning is
+	 * cgroup specific, it unconditionally needs to place the task on a
+	 * runqueue.
+	 */
+	sched_cgroup_fork(p, args);
+
+	/*
 	 * From this point on we must avoid any synchronous user-space
 	 * communication until we take the tasklist-lock. In particular, we do
 	 * not want user-space to be able to predict the process start-time by
@@ -2375,7 +2386,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_stru
 	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 
 	proc_fork_connector(p);
-	sched_post_fork(p, args);
+	sched_post_fork(p);
 	cgroup_post_fork(p, args);
 	perf_event_fork(p);
 
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1215,9 +1215,8 @@ int tg_nop(struct task_group *tg, void *
 }
 #endif
 
-static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
+static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p, bool update_load)
 {
-	bool update_load = !(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & TASK_NEW);
 	int prio = p->static_prio - MAX_RT_PRIO;
 	struct load_weight *load = &p->se.load;
 
@@ -4408,7 +4407,7 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags
 			p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(0);
 
 		p->prio = p->normal_prio = p->static_prio;
-		set_load_weight(p);
+		set_load_weight(p, false);
 
 		/*
 		 * We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has
@@ -4426,6 +4425,7 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags
 
 	init_entity_runnable_average(&p->se);
 
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_INFO
 	if (likely(sched_info_on()))
 		memset(&p->sched_info, 0, sizeof(p->sched_info));
@@ -4441,18 +4441,23 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p, struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
+void sched_cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *p, struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
-#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
-	struct task_group *tg;
-#endif
 
+	/*
+	 * Because we're not yet on the pid-hash, p->pi_lock isn't strictly
+	 * required yet, but lockdep gets upset if rules are violated.
+	 */
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
-	tg = container_of(kargs->cset->subsys[cpu_cgrp_id],
-			  struct task_group, css);
-	p->sched_task_group = autogroup_task_group(p, tg);
+	if (1) {
+		struct task_group *tg;
+		tg = container_of(kargs->cset->subsys[cpu_cgrp_id],
+				  struct task_group, css);
+		tg = autogroup_task_group(p, tg);
+		p->sched_task_group = tg;
+	}
 #endif
 	rseq_migrate(p);
 	/*
@@ -4463,7 +4468,10 @@ void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct
 	if (p->sched_class->task_fork)
 		p->sched_class->task_fork(p);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+}
 
+void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p)
+{
 	uclamp_post_fork(p);
 }
 
@@ -6923,7 +6931,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p
 		put_prev_task(rq, p);
 
 	p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
-	set_load_weight(p);
+	set_load_weight(p, true);
 	old_prio = p->prio;
 	p->prio = effective_prio(p);
 
@@ -7214,7 +7222,7 @@ static void __setscheduler_params(struct
 	 */
 	p->rt_priority = attr->sched_priority;
 	p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p);
-	set_load_weight(p);
+	set_load_weight(p, true);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -9447,7 +9455,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 #endif
 	}
 
-	set_load_weight(&init_task);
+	set_load_weight(&init_task, false);
 
 	/*
 	 * The boot idle thread does lazy MMU switching as well: