Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964949AbXBOHKE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:10:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964951AbXBOHKE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:10:04 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:17440 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964949AbXBOHKB (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:10:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZMXrWwms1JUvdjYFs9IOCQtlw4Mdj4DqOyhh+Su7GAo7zAe0FgQDqsGoYHKHLbbc3LM+7vgHQYuznicoNwMs35m5r0gHNjwwXoI2TmYFnvI+NYA0XHp6xAhKdYhTjXxS7E99MqknGzx3Ocx5cV5VNGmzGFQ412hjYJOgm0xFs+w= Message-ID: <9b3a62ab0702142309m701789e5vf0fb5a1ebc23c1a1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:09:59 -0800 From: "v j" To: "Trent Waddington" Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers Cc: "Neil Brown" , "Dave Jones" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3d57814d0702142302k4a517e5cp74ca2e9e2d886b3d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9b3a62ab0702142115m4ea7d2c0m6869eb64ef3ee14e@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702142116n4069e16cl1bc8f546f41d935@mail.gmail.com> <20070215061149.GE15654@redhat.com> <9b3a62ab0702142227j19386132s870a0e745cfbb8d1@mail.gmail.com> <17876.296.29422.494455@notabene.brown> <9b3a62ab0702142255u16dc98e0s38876f03ac6355f7@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702142302k4a517e5cp74ca2e9e2d886b3d@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1103 Lines: 28 I am well aware of what Greg KHs position is, in fact he is the reason I started the whole rant. This is only a plea to the "higher authorities". Linus, please save Linux! vj On 2/14/07, Trent Waddington wrote: > On 2/15/07, v j wrote: > > If adding closed drivers to Linux is illegal, I am perfectly fine with > > that. Just say so. I am not at a dead-end yet, until you make that > > statement. Once you make that statement, then all bets are off. I am > > betting that most companies will not even consider Linux as an > > alternative in the embedded space if this were the case. > > Greg KH has already made that statement. > > http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/ols_2006_keynote.html > > half way down, "Closed source Linux kernel modules are illegal". As > was said, welcome to 6 months ago. > > Trent > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/