Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 22:02:54 -0800
From:   Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To:     "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc:     "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 20/44] mm/pkeys: Add PKS test for context switching
Message-ID: <Yg82jhb/R8Dh9AUw@iweiny-desk3>
References: <20220127175505.851391-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20220127175505.851391-21-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <da79f69a41925f26d810f42f34dd149f5ea69d5c.camel@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <da79f69a41925f26d810f42f34dd149f5ea69d5c.camel@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:47:14AM -0800, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 09:54 -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> >  lib/pks/pks_test.c                     |  74 +++++++++++
> 
> Since this only tests a specific operation of pks, should it be named
> more specifically? Or it might be handy if it ran all the PKS tests,
> even though the others can be run directly.

I've been thinking the same thing too.  I have just not gotten around to it
yet.

Ira