Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965688AbXBOLwp (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:52:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965693AbXBOLwp (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:52:45 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:56862 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965688AbXBOLwo (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:52:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:52:46 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Neil Brown Cc: v j , Trent Waddington , Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers Message-ID: <20070215115246.GE27656@stusta.de> References: <9b3a62ab0702142115m4ea7d2c0m6869eb64ef3ee14e@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702142116n4069e16cl1bc8f546f41d935@mail.gmail.com> <20070215061149.GE15654@redhat.com> <9b3a62ab0702142227j19386132s870a0e745cfbb8d1@mail.gmail.com> <17876.296.29422.494455@notabene.brown> <9b3a62ab0702142255u16dc98e0s38876f03ac6355f7@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702142302k4a517e5cp74ca2e9e2d886b3d@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702142309m701789e5vf0fb5a1ebc23c1a1@mail.gmail.com> <17876.3097.454664.16340@notabene.brown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17876.3097.454664.16340@notabene.brown> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2103 Lines: 55 On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:30:33PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Wednesday February 14, vj.linux@gmail.com wrote: > > I am well aware of what Greg KHs position is, in fact he is the reason > > I started the whole rant. This is only a plea to the "higher > > authorities". Linus, please save Linux! > > Linus is not in any position to do anything. The die is cast. > > You should speak to a lawyer. > > The key issue is this: > Does combining your work with Linux create a derived work. > > If it does not, you have nothing to worry about. > If it does, then maybe you should worry. > > If someone who owns copyright in part of the Linux kernel that you > are using, decides that they think you have created a derived work, > then they might bring this to your attention and ask you to abide by > the conditions in the license under which you obtained the Linux > kernel. If no suitable resolution can be found, they might take you > to court for using their protected work without a valid license (The > GPL becomes void if you breach it's requirements). > > And then the judge might or might not find against you. But it is > very hard to know in advance how the judge will decide in a > particular case. Hence the best advice is to speak to a lawyer, > They have the best chance of advising your how to minimise your > risk. > > > I hope that makes the situation clear enough. You missed one point: In every country you distribute your product, a local kernel developer could bring the case to a local court based on local copyright law. > NeilBrown cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/