Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 20 Feb 2022 20:00:39 +0100
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>, dhowells@redhat.com,
        dwmw2@infradead.org, ardb@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
        serge@hallyn.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, keescook@chromium.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, weiyongjun1@huawei.com,
        keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, pjones@redhat.com,
        konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Enroll kernel keys thru MOK
Message-ID: <YhKP12KEmyqyS8rj@iki.fi>
References: <20220126025834.255493-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
 <YfFP6OHqBVNWKL2C@iki.fi>
 <YfFTf6vIpNMIrwH0@iki.fi>
 <78d2c13ad60b5f845cb841d257d1b41290f575c6.camel@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <78d2c13ad60b5f845cb841d257d1b41290f575c6.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 05:06:09PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
> 
> > > Thank you. I'll pick these soon. Is there any objections?
> 
> No objections.
> > 
> > Mimi brought up that we need a MAINTAINERS update for this and also
> > .platform.
> > 
> > We have these:
> > 
> > - KEYS/KEYRINGS
> > - CERTIFICATE HANDLING
> > 
> > I would put them under KEYRINGS for now and would not consider further
> > subdivision for the moment.
> 
> IMA has dependencies on the platform_certs/ and now on the new .machine
> keyring.  Just adding "F: security/integrity/platform_certs/" to the
> KEYS/KEYRINGS record, ignores that dependency.  The discussion wouldn't
> even be on the linux-integrity mailing list.
> 
> Existing requirement:
> - The keys on the .platform keyring are limited to verifying the kexec
> image.
> 
> New requirements based on Eric Snowbergs' patch set:
> - When IMA_KEYRINGS_PERMIT_SIGNED_BY_BUILTIN_OR_SECONDARY is enabled,
> the MOK keys will not be loaded directly onto the .machine keyring or
> indirectly onto the .secondary_trusted_keys keyring.
> 
> - Only when a new IMA Kconfig explicitly allows the keys on the
> .machine keyrings, will the CA keys stored in MOK be loaded onto the
> .machine keyring.
> 
> Unfortunately I don't think there is any choice, but to define a new
> MAINTAINERS entry.  Perhaps something along the lines of:
> 
> KEYS/KEYRINGS_INTEGRITY
> M:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> M:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> L:      keyrings@vger.kernel.org
> L:      linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
> F:      security/integrity/platform_certs
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Mimi

This would work for me.

BR, Jarkko