Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161568AbXBOWeQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:34:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161567AbXBOWeQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:34:16 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:59919 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161569AbXBOWeP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:34:15 -0500 Message-ID: <45D4DFE4.7060607@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:34:12 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070130) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Snook CC: v j , Trent Waddington , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers References: <9b3a62ab0702142115m4ea7d2c0m6869eb64ef3ee14e@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702142116n4069e16cl1bc8f546f41d935@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702142147p4eede234ybc9880a38772f55f@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702142214p5c33a02am7e783c59ae0a64f1@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702142235i687f8481x4eb72269e7f7fa9b@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702142246r7e4eac4bv26c2ed46ff588871@mail.gmail.com> <45D4C0E3.30600@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45D4C0E3.30600@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1653 Lines: 36 Chris Snook wrote: > Collaborating with the competition ("coopetition") on a common > technology platform reduces costs for anyone who chooses to get > involved, giving them a collective competitive edge against anyone who > doesn't. This is why there is so much industry interest in F/OSS, and > mortal enemies in the business world happily work together on technical > issues in Linux. [...] > Your competitors who do participate in the community (and there are a > lot in the embedded space) enjoy reduced development costs, more stable > and better-reviewed code, continuous compatibility with the latest > versions, and influence in the community over the direction of future > development. If you want to cede this advantage to your competitors, > that's between you and your investors. I definitely agree that the above is an accurate assessment. There is a flip side too. For hardware vendors, there is an interesting dynamic of cooperation /and/ competition. Hardware vendors still compete based on features, IP, and many other levels. A hardware vendor that is unaware of how to compete in an open source world is a hardware vendor with a big fat hole in their business model. It isn't usually politically correct to state this out loud, but, hardware vendors still compete quite heavily using "closed" intellectual property. With open source, the lines just shift. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/