Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932925AbXBPCJs (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423024AbXBPCJs (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:48 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.235]:18421 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932925AbXBPCJr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JnsHHJb1p5jKz+EGZsSg26LesdlCtcvBBPX0tfo1PLZEImXeviY+JELsGC2pTpYbV2ofJ6Cml8PhclNoSL09XEj3dREYOjPns78poyqyxwNnbF1dD2h6O0s7DeFv3ybm1k1eV6CxUZrwi8y6wh7uUknlPMbH/pqZtQ+hscKS810= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:09:40 -0800 From: "Michael K. Edwards" To: "Jeff Garzik" Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers Cc: "v j" , "Theodore Tso" , "Dave Jones" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <45D4FCC7.2090206@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9b3a62ab0702142115m4ea7d2c0m6869eb64ef3ee14e@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702142116n4069e16cl1bc8f546f41d935@mail.gmail.com> <20070215061149.GE15654@redhat.com> <9b3a62ab0702142227j19386132s870a0e745cfbb8d1@mail.gmail.com> <20070215165339.GB5285@thunk.org> <9b3a62ab0702151020k5bd0e4c9w763e1b01288ccc4f@mail.gmail.com> <45D4DCE3.9070002@garzik.org> <45D4FCC7.2090206@garzik.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1852 Lines: 39 On 2/15/07, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Michael K. Edwards wrote: > > Bzzzt. The whole point of the GPL is to "guarantee your freedom to > > share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for > > all its users." > > No, that's the FSF marketing fluff you've been taught to recite. Didn't read far into that e-mail, did you? That's a quote from the GPL preamble, which isn't part of the offer of contract but is arguably legally relevant context. It's largely consistent with the license as I read it. It's also consistent with the origins of the GPL, as you can read anywhere that folk history is sold. > In the context of the Linux kernel, I'm referring to the original reason > why Linus chose the GPL for the Linux kernel. Can't say; wasn't there. But I doubt that anyone truly "funnels contributions back" to the kernel because of the letter of the GPL. They do so because they think it will lower their costs, raise their revenues, hedge their risks, earn goodwill from peers, enhance their employability, stroke their egos, save the world, please their Author and/or Linus, and so on and so forth. The GPL tells us what is likely to happen in the event of a conflict that gets as far as a courtroom. I think the smart money's on conflict avoidance (that's kind of ironic, isn't it), and failing that, on ignoring the FSF and other armchair lawyers and reading the law (spelled A-P-P-E-L-L-A-T-E D-E-C-I-S-I-O-N-S) for yourself. That is, after all, what judges have done and will continue to do, at least until the Revolution comes. Cheers, - Michael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/