Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHk-=wiWZ=3dTuRq46KvQVpx-e7xqrnMAVB73dzj7g4Pbwc1zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1778a683-30fa-9119-c3ce-2dddb5939809@roeck-us.net>
In-Reply-To: <1778a683-30fa-9119-c3ce-2dddb5939809@roeck-us.net>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:31:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgyJOBhc9PQr-iAW7yYWoni8Gr+O30vtwDR--opn8hyTA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.17-rc5
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:10 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> Oh, that is "just" the result of the netfilter build problem.

Oh, ok. I assumed it was some runtime failure since it was under the
qemu rubric.

> The real question is why to patch introducing the problem made it
> upstream even though the problem was reported several days before
> the push request was sent.

Yeah, there's a separate gripe-thread for that. The fix is in the
netfilter tree and has been there for a week...

               Linus