Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:7420:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hk32csp4529886pxb; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:17:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVAVJ87rAdyfdi9MlBjJsoBndG1zO3s78rVPCeHAPx/SBWMOZ9IKBsKU7K1FuBrV/hiemJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:375:b0:404:c2be:3b8c with SMTP id s21-20020a056402037500b00404c2be3b8cmr24614152edw.247.1645517842719; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:17:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1645517842; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zzxCgCUBbgigzGNlvRSw7fRzs8lapgKTtV359fgFgE80qLCmqDuaGqfNJ0QvrJGaUp oU5IynI9WJdWt9xQt98dx6Y5X519DtXflYEHGIYtfss8rw1KHxuIflGCsfgaSs6f0bQk hlMljScDZrPUkXB/3Vr9gJfOnU316j51F8DKYl02D8X9kZDabLXjmcbiTcgj+wLpJ+cI plWizr0pRe0Zmb1F9rYfcDWVvyW6UN3/iEoDRWLHYJz3HFXTavY2yAvPS5Y2wqCByK+P FPiMOjG5IRrWMzkXf76x85iKt0JlSg5xfBHYlVCys02PFIqIHt3KGAmTFgLrx2Y2HCeA dW4Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=G0GfwrcLD4lf4ANifuaF1OYMcDG4+GeX0AlNzDkoZxA=; b=QM5k+sAZgxiO2M3MzitX8L5wdvVcGvBhjs4Tpmh+b83pGY5w033ITppMn/DKBbetOO UTAHFk1WHg+RroNaD0+vT/4HS2RVTIc5Vso3i3IA/OuiVOoweXrVxaKKMcGDSbTePR9E tfqFcG7e447l0Fm6s1b0Zv7PHw3OupnHAESQZUTfzBPrB1r6RgGlfAZXjOO3jvwlP7sK 9johFVlqWCslyWFisMkKCnArOqQuo6uJ9Wct9rd0wYoB7PY26fmx70yfLtIZx7lbMu9D qM+IHC7FXJCgC85eLRFzGPz7s9OPkE/mw8cLeQLSgmlW0WjYWE+MMpJNsU9xnEDrXm6N 3Psg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GPGPbJ8g; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y12si12970732edm.454.2022.02.22.00.17.00; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:17:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GPGPbJ8g; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229653AbiBVILo (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:11:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53444 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229641AbiBVILm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:11:42 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C84151D10 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:11:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1645517474; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=G0GfwrcLD4lf4ANifuaF1OYMcDG4+GeX0AlNzDkoZxA=; b=GPGPbJ8g9m5ZNPRlCjNidVBUlgY+hGZagwh7L1qGGuvb0JpRSmPKWz+rQh6EskDlXKCw92 0ieNXpPp3bnuaC+y7gOsxD9F279JNOwyn/IoAvCz5jKlNT7Lhn1qnjajt8ziygF1WBNb9h 3hyCovAZNadPFiIaiZLOS257/SGRPHI= Received: from mail-qv1-f72.google.com (mail-qv1-f72.google.com [209.85.219.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-649-UE2Uv2rNPqmq66h1FZpQfg-1; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:11:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: UE2Uv2rNPqmq66h1FZpQfg-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f72.google.com with SMTP id fq2-20020a056214258200b0042c39c09e5dso20086272qvb.18 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:11:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=G0GfwrcLD4lf4ANifuaF1OYMcDG4+GeX0AlNzDkoZxA=; b=1jA9jAdrgWtDjuX8qEPa4V1c5w1KOIp8KAJoBYJdleetlNFKTpZ7AD8NuPzjjBAQ/M Fx78NZq5Lg52dXiLWp6h30McLs0g97s3o8XoPopuJiSyhrBq4B+bjEEOtsOnDh4F8FNV MUldwKrspwaP/hUh4BvN4qpdzHiLVrn8OqdKiSPpmVEnDYwNImpzexBMJGXBVYGzYA2P PSnSEvq4ivlU/LGOf7OQH/Ydwtz0W20ImbkhG7Qz7UNuw+hEfL9/k8B1fFmGf3WtM1ya uUGg9+7IAiJV6ZW2r9CGND3EoFruf7CYSWtVt0YINLB1qVLdxkGAjMD/Y3H+Z+5AvarU YwLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LOv+xBGQFRy+OfIF+Dc7m+zhwWXCYRgs7E1uSB080tjjsWHX/ 8GgXd7GOj5Fs5iT6Yrea+ovEudJP/a39Y51vE4k1T7JrKJ1ObnpC4NEyx367yvCsXVhHJ+LhpAm 0e2Gz3BUCAcSVL9dN2xI+3xaL X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3706:b0:648:afb4:5794 with SMTP id de6-20020a05620a370600b00648afb45794mr8516393qkb.433.1645517471387; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:11:11 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3706:b0:648:afb4:5794 with SMTP id de6-20020a05620a370600b00648afb45794mr8516386qkb.433.1645517471142; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:11:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sgarzare-redhat (host-95-248-229-156.retail.telecomitalia.it. [95.248.229.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n16sm5744274qkn.115.2022.02.22.00.11.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:11:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:11:04 +0100 From: Stefano Garzarella To: Dan Carpenter Cc: kbuild@lists.01.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , lkp@intel.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Christie , Jason Wang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Asias He , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: don't check owner in vhost_vsock_stop() while releasing Message-ID: <20220222081104.a2woahjgno2iv7yl@sgarzare-redhat> References: <20220221114916.107045-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> <202202220707.AM3rKUcP-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202202220707.AM3rKUcP-lkp@intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:30:17AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >Hi Stefano, > >url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stefano-Garzarella/vhost-vsock-don-t-check-owner-in-vhost_vsock_stop-while-releasing/20220221-195038 >base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next >config: x86_64-randconfig-m031-20220221 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220222/202202220707.AM3rKUcP-lkp@intel.com/config) >compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0 > >If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >Reported-by: kernel test robot >Reported-by: Dan Carpenter > >smatch warnings: >drivers/vhost/vsock.c:655 vhost_vsock_stop() error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'. > >vim +/ret +655 drivers/vhost/vsock.c > >3ace84c91bfcde Stefano Garzarella 2022-02-21 632 static int vhost_vsock_stop(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, bool check_owner) >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 633 { >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 634 size_t i; >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 635 int ret; >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 636 >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 637 mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex); >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 638 >3ace84c91bfcde Stefano Garzarella 2022-02-21 639 if (check_owner) { >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 640 ret = vhost_dev_check_owner(&vsock->dev); >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 641 if (ret) >433fc58e6bf2c8 Asias He 2016-07-28 642 goto err; >3ace84c91bfcde Stefano Garzarella 2022-02-21 643 } > >"ret" not initialized on else path. Oooops, I was testing with vhost_vsock_dev_release() where we don't check the ret value, but of course we need to initialize it to 0 for the vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl() use case. I'll fix in the v2. Thanks for the report, Stefano